All their arguments are specifically anti-white. It's how they get away with racist non-whites; "racism is PrIvIlEgE + pOwEr" or whatever because that means they can always define whites as the oppressor regardless of what proportion of the population they are.
There are already no 'minority' protections. The language is ostensibly neutral, but it's always used in a way to benefit their political clients.
All their arguments are specifically anti-white. It's how they get away with racist non-whites; "racism is PrIvIlEgE + pOwEr" or whatever because that means they can always define whites as the oppressor regardless of what proportion of the population they are.