Newsome is running for President.
(archive.ph)
Comments (21)
sorted by:
This asshole thinks he can pretend to be a centrist just by vetoing this bill?
So many people left CA recently because of how shitty Newsom was.
I myself left CA a year ago because of this asshole.
In 2024 Newsom must be crushed for all of our sake.
Biden's current run has been the worst Presidency I ever seen in my entire lifetime. The scary thing is that Gavin Newsom would be even worse.
Gavin Newsom is as arrogant and unhinged as the protagonist of the American Psycho film.
Ronald DeSantis is the only guy I can see dismantling Newsom in a debate and saving our country away from ruin.
Donald Trump on the other hand with how poorly he handled the debates against Biden will fare poorly.
Enough swing voters of our country might vote for Newsom over Trump causing the election to be close enough where the voter fraud seals the deal
I hope the GOP base can realize this in 2024 and nominate the correct man to run against Newsom.
We can risk the fate of our entire nation on whether people can get over TDS or instead go for DeSantis.
The choice is simple.
It is worth DeSantis leaving Florida if he can save us from the absolute spine chilling horror of a potential Newsom presidency.
Trump's constant interruptions of Biden during the first debate in 2020 did hurt him with swing voters.
Trump unfortunately had COVID and missed the second debate when they demanded to do it remotely.
The third debate, Trump had a meh performance and by then people were already early voting.
Trump's debate performance against Hillary in 2016 was excellent. His debate performance against Biden was sloppy at best.
Trump will be four years older in 2024.
The optics of a 78 year old Trump debating a younger Newsom would be devastating.
I pray everyday our base doesn't make the critical mistake of nominating Trump again if the Dem nominee is Newsom.
It would be unnecessarily difficult but Trump could potentially win against a 82 year old Biden but running against Newsom the age gap would hurt severely.
To clarify for anyone who doesn't remember, Trump had previously contracted COVID (between 1st and 2nd debate) and had already recovered. Biden and his remote controllers seized on COVID hysteria to demand a zoom call where they could feed him the answers or cut the feed without anyone being the wiser. Naturally Trump's team refused.
As far as the other debates, I only remember Chris Wallace interrupting constantly in the first one whenever Trump would try to correct the record. I'd really need some proof of this "swing voters" theory and that these strangely undecided people would vote against somebody because they spoke up to answer the other side's lies. I thought Trump only did bad in the third debate because he acted neutered and DIDN'T interrupt enough.
I just want to know what DeSantis will do to punish 2020 election fraud and destroy the deep state and three letter agencies.
"Safe injection sites" are an extension of the same half-assed scam as methadone clinics and "rehab," and they will not solve the problem of degenerate junkies shooting up and nodding in public spaces. This breed of junkie actually gets off on exhibiting his sick degenerate twisted habits to innocent passersby.
The only solution to public nuisance junkies is serious jail time followed by a stint in the workhouse. Make them kick in a cell then put their useless asses to work. Hard work like weeding tomato fields.
Making opiates legal OTC to 21+ is the real answer, which would allow even harsher penalties than those I suggest for public junk intoxication/nuisance.
I was going to downvote when I started reading that last line, but I finished it because I'm not a reactionary cunt. Your idea makes sense. Make it legal so we can send them to jail just for having it in their system. I like that a lot.
At my work, we have a bum who spends time in the local methodone clinic he's been visiting for years, standing on the other side of a mailbox that marks the end of my company's property. He stands there all day, everyday begging for money and we can't do anything because he's not on our property. I want to throw him into traffic.
Not exactly. Legal punishments would be for public intoxication and nuisance, not mere intoxication. I don't want anyone dragged to prison for being high as long as that high person minds his own business, behaves normally in public, and lets other people do the same.
Of course, employers would (and should) continue to demand sobriety on the job, regardless of the legal status of a particular intoxicant.
I hold the Libertarian position on drug use.
At least he's going to the clinic and not shooting up on the street.
His offense is public nuisance and panhandling.
Harsher penalties for known addicts committing these antisocial acts would be a good idea.
It's funny that 'the answer' is something that no country has ever done successfully.
It's the second half that's important. Like other forms of public intoxication, just having it in your system while in public is considered endangering the welfare of others, and you go to jail. Which is the real solution.
Those countries that had were pressured by the US to stop. These countries (Morocco, Turkey, Iran ("Persia"), Iraq, Afghanistan) had large addict populations but none of the crime and antisocial behavior we see in the US and UK that's associated with illegal junk and the methadone clinic scam. Where there is grinding poverty, hopelessness, and disease, there is a corresponding market for opiates, but not everyone enjoys them, and to paraphrase Ron Paul, no normal person will suddenly decide to take on a junk habit just because he can without prosecution.
The Swiss had the right idea but did not go far enough, did not prosecute public nuisance junkies.
England's maintenance scheme didn't work because it restricted legal sales and possession to "established addicts" and naturally they diverted their legal supplies, selling to their fellow junkies and to casual users for profit.
If anyone 21+ could buy their heroin over the counter there would be no incentive to sell to others, unless the state ill-advisedly jacked up the price per dose with a tax or pharma companies inflated their prices.
Opiates are extraordinarily inexpensive, with a month's supply costing less than 30 USD retail.
I mean ... it works. I'm an alcoholic, but I keep it on my property.
Precisely.
kek.
the last time they asked Biden if he is running in 2024 he was extremely indignant.
he doesn't know he is demented yet and wants to run.
this gonna be gud.
governor french laundry and exempted vineyards?
hilarious that any californian thinks he'll win when just about every state hates california.
So ... a jew wants to introduce a culture of opium dens again.
Colour me shocked.
Shocked I say.
*puts on unpopular hat*
I'm the strongest opponent of 'legalizing heroin', 'harm reduction', and stuff like that, but as far as I know, this sort of thing has been very successful in combating the harms heroin addicts to society.
Nope. It simply makes it legal for them to do it. They still do nothing but sponge off society and cause trouble like begging, attacking each other, shitting in the street, etc..
Evidence: I work in a shopping plaza that has several of them that go through begging and stealing shit.
Call the non-emergency police line? (ha ha ha ha ha ha)
Chase them off? (Need a gun and you're probably in a libshit state) ...
Shame them, loudly and publicly? ...