He deliberately doesn't, because he likes it. He's generally pretty far gone in terms of "Men should be required to protect women", so it makes sense he'd ally himself with TERFs.
That's what it wants you to think. Meanwhile in the shadows of the Upside Down, the transdimensional entity known as TheImpossibleOfVenice cackles gleefully as more Internet anons fall into it's web.
It's like a jealous ex girlfriend who stalks and harasses you. And any time you bring up any criticism of women he immediately leaps to their defense, screaming "not all women" in whatever roundabout way he wants to.
You you think a bachelor tax is a good idea, you support alimony, you're for abortion but against any way for men to opt out, you apparently think single men are "Pathetic weasels afraid that they might have to actually contribute to society."
Basically, all your views together add up to trapping men into providing for women whether they want to or not.
But probably #1 argument without wasting too much of my time finding a better one would be this:
Has nothing to do with 'men having to protect women'. In case you didn't know, women can be single too.
you support alimony
Again, nothing to do with your bizarre gender obsession.
you're for abortion but against any way for men to opt out
You think that not being able to opt out from supporting your own child that you voluntarily created is 'men having to protect women'? You are beyond deranged.
apparently think single men are "Pathetic weasels afraid that they might have to actually contribute to society."
No, not 'single men'. Try again without the strawman this time.
If that's not literally demanding men be required to protect women, I don't know what is.
WOW! Really got me there! What every society has done throughout recorded history, draft single men to fight in wars. It's all for the womans!
speaking of archives... for those that want them take your pick
https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:https%3A%2F%2Freduxx.info%2Fspanish-parents-to-sue-municipality-over-pornographic-event-for-children%2F
https://cc.bingj.com/cache.aspx?q=url%3ahttps%3a%2f%2freduxx.info%2fspanish-parents-to-sue-municipality-over-pornographic-event-for-children%2f&d=3684323924708&mkt=en-US&setlang=en-US&w=S_ipCDZR9ovv99PX1uB60agroJhJD60r
https://yandexwebcache.net/yandbtm?fmode=inject&tm=1660073724&tld=com&lang=en&la=1659679488&text=https%3A//reduxx.info/spanish-parents-to-sue-municipality-over-pornographic-event-for-children/&url=https%3A//reduxx.info/&l10n=en&mime=html&sign=5035034f53fb506be8fa058f74de32d1&keyno=0
above are cache copys below is archive.today
https://archive.ph/20220809184241/https://reduxx.info/spanish-parents-to-sue-municipality-over-pornographic-event-for-children/
and this is a useful extention to quick search archives
https://github.com/dessant/web-archives
https://archive.ph/63LPz
He deliberately doesn't, because he likes it. He's generally pretty far gone in terms of "Men should be required to protect women", so it makes sense he'd ally himself with TERFs.
That's what it wants you to think. Meanwhile in the shadows of the Upside Down, the transdimensional entity known as TheImpossibleOfVenice cackles gleefully as more Internet anons fall into it's web.
Have you seen how he argues with Imp?
It's like a jealous ex girlfriend who stalks and harasses you. And any time you bring up any criticism of women he immediately leaps to their defense, screaming "not all women" in whatever roundabout way he wants to.
He's like jester but for women instead of jews.
Glad I'm not the only one that sees the pattern.
Example?
You you think a bachelor tax is a good idea, you support alimony, you're for abortion but against any way for men to opt out, you apparently think single men are "Pathetic weasels afraid that they might have to actually contribute to society."
Basically, all your views together add up to trapping men into providing for women whether they want to or not.
But probably #1 argument without wasting too much of my time finding a better one would be this:
TheImpossible1: "Draft women".
You: "Draft single men"
If that's not literally demanding men be required to protect women, I don't know what is.
WTF is a bachelor tax? Pay the state to compensate being unmarried?
Has nothing to do with 'men having to protect women'. In case you didn't know, women can be single too.
Again, nothing to do with your bizarre gender obsession.
You think that not being able to opt out from supporting your own child that you voluntarily created is 'men having to protect women'? You are beyond deranged.
No, not 'single men'. Try again without the strawman this time.
WOW! Really got me there! What every society has done throughout recorded history, draft single men to fight in wars. It's all for the womans!
Barcelona is the faggot central of Spain.
They have a gigantic purple dildo shaped building in the middle of their city.
Why would I archive such excellent content?
Not sure you know what 'sophistry' is. The sub agrees that it's excellent content: see the upvotes on the post.
>Reduxx
>excellent content
Yes, as evidenced by the fact that this post was extraordinarily well-liked here.