What is there to refute about idiotic claims presented with no evidence? I'd point you to David Starkey, Glenn Greenwald and Dave Rubin who are none of those things that you claimed are applicable to every homosexual.
If you think any of the aforementioned news personalities have lived ‘normal’ sex lives up til now, I’d like to introduce you to my Thai houseboy Ping. Honest, I just let him clean up the place and make a few bucks. Sure is a hard worker for a fifteen year old! Did you check out his ass?
Basically all of it (I guess you could quibble on the 'normal' thing, but I had already addressed that), but he didn't seem like the kind who can engage in meaningful conversation.
It just further weakens your position. He may be pedantic and inflammatory , but you know inside he is correct on a fundamental level. Thats why you cant respond. Same reason why Alex Jones is ‘always right’.
Huh, didn't know you were a crazy person.
What is there to refute about idiotic claims presented with no evidence? I'd point you to David Starkey, Glenn Greenwald and Dave Rubin who are none of those things that you claimed are applicable to every homosexual.
If you think any of the aforementioned news personalities have lived ‘normal’ sex lives up til now, I’d like to introduce you to my Thai houseboy Ping. Honest, I just let him clean up the place and make a few bucks. Sure is a hard worker for a fifteen year old! Did you check out his ass?
But you have no evidence?
Yes, I'm sure that Glenn Greenwald, who is left of the Democratic Party, moved conservatism left, as opposed to having nothing to do with it.
But nice red herring. Whether or not they did is completely irrelevant to your claim that they are all child groomers and the rest of it.
They do? I wasn't aware that you have detailed knowledge of their sexual activities, including whether or not they use condoms.
You just repeated the crap you spouted instead of providing a shred of evidence for it.
You want to disagree on a specific point, or just generally?
Basically all of it (I guess you could quibble on the 'normal' thing, but I had already addressed that), but he didn't seem like the kind who can engage in meaningful conversation.
It just further weakens your position. He may be pedantic and inflammatory , but you know inside he is correct on a fundamental level. Thats why you cant respond. Same reason why Alex Jones is ‘always right’.
It's not that he is 'inflammatory', it's that he makes huge claims based on no evidence at all.