What is there to refute about idiotic claims presented with no evidence? I'd point you to David Starkey, Glenn Greenwald and Dave Rubin who are none of those things that you claimed are applicable to every homosexual.
If you think any of the aforementioned news personalities have lived ‘normal’ sex lives up til now, I’d like to introduce you to my Thai houseboy Ping. Honest, I just let him clean up the place and make a few bucks. Sure is a hard worker for a fifteen year old! Did you check out his ass?
So you named 2 grifters and a wokie. You sure owned me.
Huh, so you didn't even know who you were talking about (and still don't, as GG is no wokie), yet you have detailed knowledge of their lives? Quite strange.
When you cram a dick into an orifice meant only for output
Which you have no idea at all if they do.
But we know based on their levels of disease, they have no interest in doing things remotely safely.
You "know" this about these individuals?
And you dropped the "grooming kids" thing in the hope that it would not be noticed that you did. Too bad.
What is there to refute about idiotic claims presented with no evidence? I'd point you to David Starkey, Glenn Greenwald and Dave Rubin who are none of those things that you claimed are applicable to every homosexual.
If you think any of the aforementioned news personalities have lived ‘normal’ sex lives up til now, I’d like to introduce you to my Thai houseboy Ping. Honest, I just let him clean up the place and make a few bucks. Sure is a hard worker for a fifteen year old! Did you check out his ass?
But you have no evidence?
Yes, I'm sure that Glenn Greenwald, who is left of the Democratic Party, moved conservatism left, as opposed to having nothing to do with it.
But nice red herring. Whether or not they did is completely irrelevant to your claim that they are all child groomers and the rest of it.
They do? I wasn't aware that you have detailed knowledge of their sexual activities, including whether or not they use condoms.
You just repeated the crap you spouted instead of providing a shred of evidence for it.
Huh, so you didn't even know who you were talking about (and still don't, as GG is no wokie), yet you have detailed knowledge of their lives? Quite strange.
Which you have no idea at all if they do.
You "know" this about these individuals?
And you dropped the "grooming kids" thing in the hope that it would not be noticed that you did. Too bad.