So you named 2 grifters and a wokie. You sure owned me.
Huh, so you didn't even know who you were talking about (and still don't, as GG is no wokie), yet you have detailed knowledge of their lives? Quite strange.
When you cram a dick into an orifice meant only for output
Which you have no idea at all if they do.
But we know based on their levels of disease, they have no interest in doing things remotely safely.
You "know" this about these individuals?
And you dropped the "grooming kids" thing in the hope that it would not be noticed that you did. Too bad.
Well, you tried and failed utterly to defend your claims. When you've got such a weak case, ignoring challenges generally works better than going down this badly.
Huh, so you didn't even know who you were talking about (and still don't, as GG is no wokie), yet you have detailed knowledge of their lives? Quite strange.
Which you have no idea at all if they do.
You "know" this about these individuals?
And you dropped the "grooming kids" thing in the hope that it would not be noticed that you did. Too bad.
Well, you tried and failed utterly to defend your claims. When you've got such a weak case, ignoring challenges generally works better than going down this badly.
Better luck next time.
The things losers say to try to save face...
"Refute even one of my points then."
LOL!