no-- the roots of Communism in white Leftism do not excuse Jewish involvement in the cultivation of its deadly ideology.

Whites aren't just at the root of it. The USSR was rules by whites. The CCP run by chinese. The Khemer Rouge by Cambodians. The spread of Leftism, Communism, and Socialism in Europe was predominantly done by whites at every level. You will find white intellectuals, white financiers, white protesters, white activists, white terrorists, white rioters, and white unionists everywhere within western Leftism.

Whites could well have poisoned themselves lethally with Leftism on their own-- but that's not the timeline we live in. Jewish thought leaders have long had a leading role in directing the rot and revolution through the financial, trade, and law sectors-- which you mentioned.

No, I didn't. I mentioned intellectuals that are ethnically jewish. Normally intellectuals that are non-practicing jews, and normally even target religious jews with their eire as backwards, non-progressive, and counter-revolutionary... because they are not ideologically jewish. They ideologically Leftist as all Leftists are.

I wonder which Ethnic group is disproportionally responsible for that?

It's not any ethnic group that is responsible, and don't give me a "disparity is evidence of discrimination" argument.

What is responsible is an ideology.

Let me put this another way: The dangers of Islam are real, yes? I assume you're not an Islamist, so let's go down this route. Let us assert Islam is a genuine threat to western civilization. But Islam is a religion and is comprised of many ethnic groups. Somalis, Arabs, Persians, and Indonesians to name a few. But to claim that a Lebanese Christian, a Hindi Indonesian, an Arab Assyrian Christian or a Bantu Christian is a threat to western society because they could bring Islamism with them is patently absurd. This is because they're not Muslim. They are very likely anti-Islam. They are more likely to assist western societies in warning them of the dangers of letting Islam become dominant in the west, since they have lived under it. The utility of Islam among Arabs, as Mohhamed intended, was to forcibly unify them at the point of a sword, regardless of their innumerable ethnic conflicts. Islam is a unifying religion that disregards race and ethnicity for submission.

Leftism works in very much the same way. It is a doctrine dedicated to achieving Rouseau's final destination by any means necessary. The reason why Marx believed that jews could not exist under Socialism is because Leftism is dominant and supreme among all things, the same way that Allah is supreme among all Muslims, and submission to the General Will is very similar to the submission to Allah. The nature of Internationalist Homo Globo nonsense is that Globalism/Leftism itself will make all people of the world ideologically homogenous. No ethnic group actually matters. Even when Leftism has been explicitly racialist or nationalist, whether in Germany under the National Socialists, or in Arabia under the Pan-Arab movement, or in Africa under Pan-Africanism, or in Cambodia under the Khmer Rouge, it's purpose is to balkanize a population into a political bloc to bring about Socialism. Leftism doesn't care what ethnic group is dominant in any one place in the long run because all ethnic groups will be eliminated inevitably when the Utopia is reached.

The muslims understand Leftism as a threat, and vice versa, because these are both supremacist totalitarian ideologies that (by definition) can not co-exist. It is why the CCP are genocide the Uyghurs. It is why the Ayatollah exterminated every Marxist revolutionary that helped him ascend to power. In fact, Jihadism is effectively the Leftist subversion of orthodox Islamic doctrine, as it's founder tried to explain with his foundational work: "Social Justice in Isalm". He basically child-rape-married the two ideologies and found pure, unadulterated, evil. A kind of absolute, totalitarian, need to murder everything that wasn't absolutely devoted to an internal and external upheaval that would bring about the return of Muhhamed, like a fucking death cult. Anyone who doesn't agree with him, isn't a true socialist muslim. It's why the saudis use the slur "Takfirists" against them (those who repeatedly 'takfir' muslims out of islam in order to justify killing them). The cautious, alliance of convenience of Islamo-Leftism in the west serves them both for the moment, before one or the other must exterminate their opposite.

There is no ethnic origin point for either ideology. Even if we were to point out that Arabs dominate many places within Islam, it's totally irrelevant because the it's not Arabs that are the problem with Islamism, it's the Islamism that's the problem with Arabs. The focal point of the entire problem is the ideology itself. Complaining about qatari influence in Islam means nothing.

Similarly within Leftism, the complaint about chinese presence within Leftism is irrelevant. So is the the complaint about jews presence within Leftism. The dominance of whites within Leftism is worse than that of jews, but you don't want to see it, because you don't want to accept that the problem isn't jews... it's Leftists. It's an ideology that seeks for the eradication of the jew as much as it seeks for the eradication of the white or the Christian.