Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

44
What did you ban Imp for, this time round? (media.kotakuinaction2.win)
posted 3 years ago by SupremeReader 3 years ago by SupremeReader +44 / -0
139 comments download share
139 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (139)
sorted by:
▲ 2 ▼
– blackestknight 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

So "us good KIAer/GGers and those bad ones who do the bad things" is a form of identity politic.

Being part of an online forum is not an identity. Identity politics is playing off protected classes from various civil rights acts. Religion, Race, Sex, Gender shit, Sexual orientation.

Not "I fucking use this forum".

It was using women and blacks

Are you completely insane ?

It was women and blacks themselves saying "Hey, stop fucking using us a shield". It wasn't a bunch of whites using them as a shield.

My god, first you claim there's no stormcucks here, now you completely reinvent and whitewash history.

Even more ironic because that's how the Woke also think.

The woke think like you. "Hey, let's claim these races and sexes have these opinions". NotYourshield wasn't this and you thinking it was means you're the one acting like the wokes you moron.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Adamrises 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Identity politics is a political approach wherein people of a particular race, religion, gender, social background, social class, environmental,[1] or other identifying factors develop political agendas that are based upon these identities

Shit even Wikipedia is giving a more neutral definition than you are. Nothing to do with protected classes or civil rights. Just the actual word identity being used as it is actually defined, instead of what one guy thinks it means.

first you claim there's no stormcucks here

Funny you mention reinventing history when you pull something completely fabricated out of your ass. I'd like you to point where I said this, please so I can find it funnier.

I know you live in a completely black and white world but you should try to realize that because you think it, doesn't make it true.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– blackestknight 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Shit even Wikipedia is giving a more neutral definition than you are.

Did you just quote Wikipedia at me ?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAA...

I can't emphasize this enough.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHA

Fucking SJW clown. GTFO.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Adamrises 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Yeah I know, its pretty funny that even they don't try to pull as big a retard move as "identity doesn't mean identity, it means civil rights."

Its okay though, you've lost the ability to actually argue so now I've gone from arguing in favor of stormcucks to being SJW. You should get your accusations straight.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– blackestknight 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

"identity doesn't mean identity, it means civil rights."

By that token, individualism is identity politics since the individual is also an identity.

It makes no sense, you're just muddying the water. Identity politics is very well defined and you're attempting to redefine it, same as SJWs redefine things like women and racism to fit their agenda.

You're just cementing what I've told you before : you're an SJW troll.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?
▲ 1 ▼
– MattTheBlack 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Wikipedia

You've clearly lost the plot over the years

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Adamrises 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

When even the retards at Wikipedia who openly and happily use it still give it a neutral definition, it makes it even sadder to try and redefine it.

It was actually the first one I could find that wasn't "its destroying America!" or "its not really that bad!" But if you'd like to say where that definition is wrong, I'm hear to listen.

permalink parent save report block reply

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - whmbz (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy