The book, it proves there are inherent differences in it based on race. Would you ban the book because it shows objective trends of iq, race and genetics. It falls under showing that different groups of people are inferior. How about intelligence tests in general? Or are you just a fraud who deems subjectively what is considered to be violence and systemic targeting of people. But since we’re at it. Slave is an undeniable racial slur that equates an entire people to owned property. Are you going to ban anyone that uses the word slave?
Slav was not used as a racial epithet, as the Ottomans who enslaved them also had slaves from Africa as well. The Cossaks, who were also Slavs, enslaved other Slavs, and sold them to the Ottomans. More than that: Slave is not used as a racial epithet in English.
You are trying to get me to be unreasonable, when my actions have been entirely reasonable so far.
The oldest written history of the Slavs can be shortly summarised--myriads of slave hunts and the enthralment of entire peoples. The Slav was the most prized of human goods. With increased strength outside his marshy land of origin, hardened to the utmost against all privation, industrious, content with little, good-humoured, and cheerful, he filled the slave markets of Europe, Asia, and Africa. It must be remembered that for every Slavonic slave who reached his destination, at least ten succumbed to inhuman treatment during transport and to the heat of the climate. Indeed Ibrāhīm (tenth century), himself in all probability a slave dealer, says: "And the Slavs cannot travel to Lombardy on account of the heat which is fatal to them." Hence their high price.
The Arabian geographer of the ninth century tells us how the Magyars in the Pontus steppe dominated all the Slavs dwelling near them. The Magyars made raids upon the Slavs and took their prisoners along the coast to Kerkh where the Byzantines came to meet them and gave Greek brocades and such wares in exchange for the prisoners. ["The Cambridge Medieval History," Vol. II, 1913]
Learn history... Slave was always a racial slur to denigrate the Slavic people as chattel property, hence the Latin word sclavus. This was well before the ottomans. Then again, I wouldn’t expect rationality from you.
?
Bell Curves are just a vernacular reference to a normal distribution.
The book, it proves there are inherent differences in it based on race. Would you ban the book because it shows objective trends of iq, race and genetics. It falls under showing that different groups of people are inferior. How about intelligence tests in general? Or are you just a fraud who deems subjectively what is considered to be violence and systemic targeting of people. But since we’re at it. Slave is an undeniable racial slur that equates an entire people to owned property. Are you going to ban anyone that uses the word slave?
Statistical information is not violence.
Slav was not used as a racial epithet, as the Ottomans who enslaved them also had slaves from Africa as well. The Cossaks, who were also Slavs, enslaved other Slavs, and sold them to the Ottomans. More than that: Slave is not used as a racial epithet in English.
You are trying to get me to be unreasonable, when my actions have been entirely reasonable so far.
Learn history... Slave was always a racial slur to denigrate the Slavic people as chattel property, hence the Latin word sclavus. This was well before the ottomans. Then again, I wouldn’t expect rationality from you.
That's not a slur. They are literally identifying a foreign people by identifying them as a commodity.
It still doesn't change the fact that it's not a racial slur in the vernacular either.