Politico Saying The Quiet Part Out Loud
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (77)
sorted by:
The book, it proves there are inherent differences in it based on race. Would you ban the book because it shows objective trends of iq, race and genetics. It falls under showing that different groups of people are inferior. How about intelligence tests in general? Or are you just a fraud who deems subjectively what is considered to be violence and systemic targeting of people. But since we’re at it. Slave is an undeniable racial slur that equates an entire people to owned property. Are you going to ban anyone that uses the word slave?
Statistical information is not violence.
Slav was not used as a racial epithet, as the Ottomans who enslaved them also had slaves from Africa as well. The Cossaks, who were also Slavs, enslaved other Slavs, and sold them to the Ottomans. More than that: Slave is not used as a racial epithet in English.
You are trying to get me to be unreasonable, when my actions have been entirely reasonable so far.
Learn history... Slave was always a racial slur to denigrate the Slavic people as chattel property, hence the Latin word sclavus. This was well before the ottomans. Then again, I wouldn’t expect rationality from you.
That's not a slur. They are literally identifying a foreign people by identifying them as a commodity.
It still doesn't change the fact that it's not a racial slur in the vernacular either.
That is a slur. You are now saying reducing an entire race to owned property by definition is not a slur. Tell me, how far is your head up your ass? Do I need you to go read the definition of slur?
Wow, you actually are this pathetic, pick up a dictionary?
You just said a word used to reduce an entire race to chattel property is not a slur, completely misused the word vernacular to the point it makes me question your English, and then said a racial slur by definition is not a racial slur.