Unless you want to argue that people are 100% nature
Except in cases of abuse, it is pretty close to 100%. People do not want to hear this, but it is the truth.
Which means it is pure selfishness and denying their own culpability when they now deny that child love over something they do. They have the freedom to do so, regardless.
The intention was not at all to deny anyone's culpability. Only to say that people are entitled to nothing.
The same way I say thank you when someone whose job is to do something does that something. Taking something for granted has always been a negative act, regardless if it is in fact granted.
It is far more likely to be taken for granted if you present it as an entitlement.
If you think this level of contrarian isn't mindless, then you really are losing your edge. Because all its doing is making you look dumber and everyone else double down because of how easy it is to pick your argument apart.
Except in cases of abuse, it is pretty close to 100%. People do not want to hear this, but it is the truth.
The intention was not at all to deny anyone's culpability. Only to say that people are entitled to nothing.
It is far more likely to be taken for granted if you present it as an entitlement.
And yet no one did.
Sure man. Whatever makes you feel more intelligent.
No one successfully challenging your claims does not make you either intelligent or stupid.