To be clear the article doesn't directly advocate that "misogyny" result in gun seizures. But the implication is there, especially in the title. They're calling for
"misogyny" to be treated as mental illness, with the definition of "misogyny" being whatever they want it to be of course. This matters because mental illness is one of the disqualifiers for gun ownership. Right now it requires a court to condemn someone to a nuthouse for that legal provision to apply, but of course the left is always thinking up new dirty tricks to harm gun owners, with backstabbing cucks like Romney eager to help them. Expect this idea to come up more if they're able to scrap the due process protections involved in locking someone in a nuthouse and stripping their gun rights.
Men in general are more likely than women to take their own lives — the CDC determined in 2009 that the male suicide rate was four times that of women.
Stop pretending you care. If you actually gave a shit about men's mental health you wouldn't be on this decades long crusade to make their lives a living hell.
Viewing violence through the lens of misogyny gives us an opportunity to help everyone — women by preventing domestic violence, society by preventing mass shootings and men by freeing them from self-destructive masculinity.
Fuck off with this r/menslib tier shit. If you want to help men LEAVE THEM THE FUCK ALONE! They know full well that you hate them and want them dead. We also know that your gun seizure fantasies are a precursor to the genocide some of the more loose lipped members of your group can't shut up about.
Viewing violence through the lens of misogyny gives us an opportunity to help everyone — women by preventing domestic violence, society by preventing mass shootings and men by freeing them from self-destructive masculinity.
Aaaagh, this fucking bitch. Help women by increasing safety, help society by increased safety, help men by...neutering/changing them! Fuck you, get help, you're a cultist.
If you want to help men LEAVE THEM THE FUCK ALONE! They know full well that you hate them and want them dead.
Well said. So many of men's troubles stem from society being absolutely shit to them. Fuck off, pull back, allow for more individualism or healthy collectivism. That's the real irony; men aren't allowed to do their own thing, and they're also not allowed a collective identify, unless they admit it's "toxic" and work on "fixing" it. No wonder some men go fucking psycho. There's no place for men, and there's no purpose for men in the mainstream, unless they self flagellate.
P.S. Imp, this is your thread to shine, don't let us down, buddy. You got this. Don't sperg out on some random topic. We're all agreeing with you here. You can do it.
Even this isn't entirely correct. They still want men to have desires for them, because that gives them something to exploit. They just want compliant followers that will accept that women are their superiors. Everything they say about masculinity is purely to lead to this outcome.
allow for more individualism or healthy collectivism.
Women can't afford for men to check out of society, it only functions based off our willingness to work hard for a society that hates us and wishes we were all killed.
As for a positive collective male identity, they don't want to allow that in case it becomes a political bloc. This is why so many pieces by female authors push division by race, wealth and age, among others. Their strength is in their in-group bias, that women as a class will usually band together on major issues. They cannot afford men doing the same thing so they try everything to divide them.
self-flagellate
I often claim feminists are sadistic, and I think this is a sort of proof of that. It's not enough for you to follow what they want, you have to do that and hate yourself, be constantly reminded that you will never, ever be as good as a woman. That your existence is a curse and your original sin can never be atoned for.
That short list of mass shootings all have one thing in common — they were all committed by men who either physically abused or otherwise expressed hatred for women.
Cause of deaths: Misogyny.
PULSE WAS A FUCKING GAY CLUB.
Also, that ridiculousness aside...
men who either physically abused or otherwise expressed hatred for women.
Mass shooters tend to be men, yes. And mass shooters are always disturbed or fanatical. Disturbed people tend to do disturbing things, like beat people up or express extreme views. They're not stable individuals. Doesn't mean the cause of death is "misogyny," there's no logic to that.
This would be like saying the cause of death of gang shooting is misogyny. Because those people are also disturbed, and often have domestic violence charges. Is one male gang member shooting another man misogyny?
and found that men with high misogyny scores were more likely to be unemployed.
And this is something they do themselves?
The whole article is typical More Feminine Way tripe, complete with ridiculous logic (Pulse was anti-woman) and very, very thinly veiled ideas that men are inherently defective.
I focus in on this line because it's the typical lying with statistics they're so famous for.
So, the first argument they will likely present here is that it's self-sabotage. That they can't control their hatred long enough to keep a job. I don't believe that to be the case, I'm known here for my strong opinions on women, but I can moderate them enough to stay employable.
I would suggest that it's more likely that their "misogyny" came not from deeply held political beliefs, but from basic observation of who is succeeding and who isn't. When you're struggling to live and you see women exploiting men through things like OnlyFans to earn enough money to buy and sell your entire life, only a robot wouldn't feel that slight hatred towards those people. Women fail upwards and it's clear in every facet of working life. Merit doesn't explain their sudden success, and the deeper you dig, the sicker the system seems to be.
I could go on about the system, how it kneecaps everyone male from their first day of school to even their day of death, but I think I've already been through that enough. I'll TL;DR it for clarity of where I'm going.
A baby is born male and instantly pushed into a society that hates that part of his identity. The teachers do everything to suppress it, up to putting him on drugs with questionable long term effects that "aid focus". Then if he gets out of that, he has to look forward to way higher standards expected for the same goals as his female peers. If they need a 3.0, he needs 3.7 - 3.8. Even after graduating, it's clear that the employment market favors women. Even if he achieves everything and becomes fairly well off, all he can spend the money on is companies that favor the group that he fought so hard to get above the hurdles that they placed on him.
But even all that, is still not enough misery for us. Women continue to push for worse and worse treatment of men, and their votes always move towards that. They are the only demographic that continue to move towards the Democratic Party, because it promised them further discrimination against men.
Even if I'm wrong that feminists truly act to reduce the male population and this informs all of their actions, the eagerness to disarm men, combined with the type of policy that feminists have pushed for in other countries, makes me confident to say that the reason they want you disarmed is because they want to hurt you.
I really hate the redesign of this site. Utterly woeful and prevents long comments by not allowing the text box to scroll enough to put your text above the keyboard.
I really hate the redesign of this site. Utterly woeful and prevents long comments by not allowing the text box to scroll enough to put your text above the keyboard.
I've never been here on mobile, but I'm assuming that's your problem. The PC browser version allows you to re-size the box to whatever dimensions you need... and then starts shrinking as soon as you resume typing until it's once again just smaller than your post and dynamically growing with each line.
Yeah, the mobile version of this site was coded by a moron. Flairs don't work, sidebars don't work, pinning posts doesn't work, half the time it doesn't refresh your inbox until you close the browser and reopen...
Imp is likely to understand that actions have consequences, and as a result take muzzle discipline and trigger discipline seriously, which already puts him well above the 50th percentile.
By virtue of him being a 6'7" gigachad, he's less likely to inappropriately draw/aim/fire over irrational fears, which pushes him over the top.
Imp is likely to understand that actions have consequences, and as a result take muzzle discipline and trigger discipline seriously,
HAHAHAHA. Imp is likely to tell you the gun was made by a woman and thus it's why he pressed the trigger and fired on his foot, because the woman who made the gun hated men.
To be clear the article doesn't directly advocate that "misogyny" result in gun seizures. But the implication is there, especially in the title. They're calling for "misogyny" to be treated as mental illness, with the definition of "misogyny" being whatever they want it to be of course. This matters because mental illness is one of the disqualifiers for gun ownership. Right now it requires a court to condemn someone to a nuthouse for that legal provision to apply, but of course the left is always thinking up new dirty tricks to harm gun owners, with backstabbing cucks like Romney eager to help them. Expect this idea to come up more if they're able to scrap the due process protections involved in locking someone in a nuthouse and stripping their gun rights.
Stop pretending you care. If you actually gave a shit about men's mental health you wouldn't be on this decades long crusade to make their lives a living hell.
Fuck off with this r/menslib tier shit. If you want to help men LEAVE THEM THE FUCK ALONE! They know full well that you hate them and want them dead. We also know that your gun seizure fantasies are a precursor to the genocide some of the more loose lipped members of your group can't shut up about.
Aaaagh, this fucking bitch. Help women by increasing safety, help society by increased safety, help men by...neutering/changing them! Fuck you, get help, you're a cultist.
Well said. So many of men's troubles stem from society being absolutely shit to them. Fuck off, pull back, allow for more individualism or healthy collectivism. That's the real irony; men aren't allowed to do their own thing, and they're also not allowed a collective identify, unless they admit it's "toxic" and work on "fixing" it. No wonder some men go fucking psycho. There's no place for men, and there's no purpose for men in the mainstream, unless they self flagellate.
P.S. Imp, this is your thread to shine, don't let us down, buddy. You got this. Don't sperg out on some random topic. We're all agreeing with you here. You can do it.
Even this isn't entirely correct. They still want men to have desires for them, because that gives them something to exploit. They just want compliant followers that will accept that women are their superiors. Everything they say about masculinity is purely to lead to this outcome.
Women can't afford for men to check out of society, it only functions based off our willingness to work hard for a society that hates us and wishes we were all killed.
As for a positive collective male identity, they don't want to allow that in case it becomes a political bloc. This is why so many pieces by female authors push division by race, wealth and age, among others. Their strength is in their in-group bias, that women as a class will usually band together on major issues. They cannot afford men doing the same thing so they try everything to divide them.
I often claim feminists are sadistic, and I think this is a sort of proof of that. It's not enough for you to follow what they want, you have to do that and hate yourself, be constantly reminded that you will never, ever be as good as a woman. That your existence is a curse and your original sin can never be atoned for.
PULSE WAS A FUCKING GAY CLUB.
Also, that ridiculousness aside...
Mass shooters tend to be men, yes. And mass shooters are always disturbed or fanatical. Disturbed people tend to do disturbing things, like beat people up or express extreme views. They're not stable individuals. Doesn't mean the cause of death is "misogyny," there's no logic to that.
This would be like saying the cause of death of gang shooting is misogyny. Because those people are also disturbed, and often have domestic violence charges. Is one male gang member shooting another man misogyny?
This author is a retarded cultist.
There is something else that more than half of all murderers have in common, but I don't see them talking about that.
Not enough masculinity in their life, is that the one?
Of all sad words of tongue and pen, the saddest are these...Imp was right again.
I mean, if you believe all women are the devil, you’ll be right once in awhile.
Now that's an interesting question.
Am I right more or less often than someone who just throws out entirely random thoughts?
And this is something they do themselves?
The whole article is typical More Feminine Way tripe, complete with ridiculous logic (Pulse was anti-woman) and very, very thinly veiled ideas that men are inherently defective.
I focus in on this line because it's the typical lying with statistics they're so famous for.
I made a post not that long ago about a women's organization literally bragging about higher male unemployment.
So, the first argument they will likely present here is that it's self-sabotage. That they can't control their hatred long enough to keep a job. I don't believe that to be the case, I'm known here for my strong opinions on women, but I can moderate them enough to stay employable.
I would suggest that it's more likely that their "misogyny" came not from deeply held political beliefs, but from basic observation of who is succeeding and who isn't. When you're struggling to live and you see women exploiting men through things like OnlyFans to earn enough money to buy and sell your entire life, only a robot wouldn't feel that slight hatred towards those people. Women fail upwards and it's clear in every facet of working life. Merit doesn't explain their sudden success, and the deeper you dig, the sicker the system seems to be.
I could go on about the system, how it kneecaps everyone male from their first day of school to even their day of death, but I think I've already been through that enough. I'll TL;DR it for clarity of where I'm going.
A baby is born male and instantly pushed into a society that hates that part of his identity. The teachers do everything to suppress it, up to putting him on drugs with questionable long term effects that "aid focus". Then if he gets out of that, he has to look forward to way higher standards expected for the same goals as his female peers. If they need a 3.0, he needs 3.7 - 3.8. Even after graduating, it's clear that the employment market favors women. Even if he achieves everything and becomes fairly well off, all he can spend the money on is companies that favor the group that he fought so hard to get above the hurdles that they placed on him.
But even all that, is still not enough misery for us. Women continue to push for worse and worse treatment of men, and their votes always move towards that. They are the only demographic that continue to move towards the Democratic Party, because it promised them further discrimination against men.
Even if I'm wrong that feminists truly act to reduce the male population and this informs all of their actions, the eagerness to disarm men, combined with the type of policy that feminists have pushed for in other countries, makes me confident to say that the reason they want you disarmed is because they want to hurt you.
I really hate the redesign of this site. Utterly woeful and prevents long comments by not allowing the text box to scroll enough to put your text above the keyboard.
I've never been here on mobile, but I'm assuming that's your problem. The PC browser version allows you to re-size the box to whatever dimensions you need... and then starts shrinking as soon as you resume typing until it's once again just smaller than your post and dynamically growing with each line.
Yeah, the mobile version of this site was coded by a moron. Flairs don't work, sidebars don't work, pinning posts doesn't work, half the time it doesn't refresh your inbox until you close the browser and reopen...
Imp knows his shit
dont girls like guys that are "in control" and make decisions for them?? isnt the guy taking the lead by definition, misogynist.
Just wait until they use AI to search 30 years worth of your emails and reddit upvotes to judge your misogyny.
The ONLY way to stop this bullshit is to start pushing for AI to be used to detect potential abortion users or BLM rioters
Imp isn't right. Imp is proving them right.
Don't sink to his level.
Imp would be more responsible with a firearm than 90% of women I know, and I know this from experience.
Simping for Imp is a whole other level of simp. I'd respect you more if you gave Belle Delphine a month on only fans, which is saying a lot.
Imp is likely to understand that actions have consequences, and as a result take muzzle discipline and trigger discipline seriously, which already puts him well above the 50th percentile.
By virtue of him being a 6'7" gigachad, he's less likely to inappropriately draw/aim/fire over irrational fears, which pushes him over the top.
HAHAHAHA. Imp is likely to tell you the gun was made by a woman and thus it's why he pressed the trigger and fired on his foot, because the woman who made the gun hated men.
Ok, now I see what you're doing. lol.
If it was, it probably wouldn't fire properly.
I'm guessing that's what you do, whitestknight.
Look at the devil, who exactly am I defending here ? No one. Thus your quip is as dumb as every comment you always make, TheIncelible1.
How am I proving them right? I explicitly have said I don't support violence.