“Conservative” Tom Nichols With A New Hot Take On Roe For The Atlantic
(media.communities.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (32)
sorted by:
That’s legally incorrect, there is no person limit to assembly. A singular person can assemble. Your right to speech is again freedom from the government to restrict your speech. The right to property is covered by a combination of the 9th and 10th amendments. This is why castle law is not universal. It does however completely invalidate his argument.
I’m claiming that the right to property is protected directly by the 9th amendment, yes. As references are made to private property across multiple constitutional rights. This is further validated by the tenth where all states have always allowed the purchase of property.
Except there is no historical protection of abortion, reference to it in any founding documents, or any historical use of abortion as a sanctioned practice until the roe v wade decision. There is more legal precedent to owning missles than there is for abortion. That’s why they never argued the right to abortion, they argued the right to privacy affords the right to an abortion, which is beyond insane.
It is. If you don't have a right to property why would the constitution need to prevent the government from taking it without fue process?
Your point started in the weeds. Nobody has ever claimed there's a right to be left alone in the Constitution, no one serious that is. There's a bunch of rights that together end up with the right to be "left alone"
From the government not being able to quarter troops in your home to due process