Yes, because some of us get sick of seeing a thread with some engagement and click on it hoping for a good discussion, and instead we're greeted by his idiocy shitting it up with copious, completely off-topic conspiracy theory replies.
It's never enough for him to just say his piece and move on, even though he's said it a million times before: he then has to endlessly argue, continuously getting further and further from the original point of the article.
I mean just look at this -- it's a post about Project Veritas' interview with a Twitter Engineer, and he's fucking talking about "white nationalism" and the 19th amendment.
We need more white babies. I am happy to let niggers put rusty coat hangers up themselves.
I exist and I don't have any conflict in my pro-abortion for niggers, make more white babies stance.
This will go about as well as last time "white nationalism" supported women. That gave us the 19th Amendment.
Are there people that just downvote you on principle? This line is just fact.
Yes, because some of us get sick of seeing a thread with some engagement and click on it hoping for a good discussion, and instead we're greeted by his idiocy shitting it up with copious, completely off-topic conspiracy theory replies.
It's never enough for him to just say his piece and move on, even though he's said it a million times before: he then has to endlessly argue, continuously getting further and further from the original point of the article.
I mean just look at this -- it's a post about Project Veritas' interview with a Twitter Engineer, and he's fucking talking about "white nationalism" and the 19th amendment.
Yes, there are.
Internet points are meaningless, but I hate having my comments dropped to the bottom of every post because of asshurt cuckolds.