I find it odd how the idea of the father wanting to keep and raise the child never comes up. I know the kind of ho that aborts a child is very unlikely to screw a guy that cares enough, but even still it's like they can't fathom that a man might love their progeny, feel responsibility towards it, and most of all, have any right whatsoever as a parent.
It's so unfathomably nonsensical that they don't even acknowledge the father's existence. It takes two to have a baby, and the baby is exactly the man's as it is the woman's, yet the man is forced to pay when the woman wants him to and the man has no say in whatever the baby lives or not. It's even stupider when the parent they picked to be responsible for this choice is the one who can't think rationally at all. And they say it is equal rights? Isn't it more equal when none of the two can choose? I know I'm rambling about leftist ideology being inconsistent like it's not the norm but come on. If you go by the sick idea that the child belongs to the parents and they can do whatever they want because of that, why pick the one that is just a bigger child? Also also, if mothers deserve this absolute power, why is it evil to bot let your child be groomed? Why do they want to take children away from what they claim to be abusive parents? I thought mothers have the authority to terminate their child's life when they want, why can't they abuse them? And if we should take kids from their abusive parents why can't we take children from the mothers who want to kill them? Of course we can't do that when they're in their womb but wouldn't the more sensible decision be to just wait until the child is born and then get them away? Why is everything so stupid? Why isn't everyone forced to marry the people they have a child with? So that the dad can be a dad and the mother can be a mother? Like God intended? Is this so fucking hard to get? Oh I'm sorry you want to sleep with chad every night and be an independent woman by day. How the fuck are you independent if your entire existence revolves around pleasure you get from men that are not you? Think about that sara, you fucking whore, oh my bad I forgot women don't think, then maybe you can't be independent and you should let a man decide, pheraps not a nigger with the superpower of ceasing to exist when approached by the prospect of being civilized. Oh but you want to study science and e a scientist who will be remembered? You will be remembered, as a fucking idiot clueless godless whore goy.
It's also a falsehood being presented, as women can give their baby to adoption.
There are dedicated places to put the baby, no question asked, no financial duty for the woman.
Abortion is not the only option for a pregnant woman who cannot or does not want to care for her baby.
I find it odd how the idea of the father wanting to keep and raise the child never comes up. I know the kind of ho that aborts a child is very unlikely to screw a guy that cares enough, but even still it's like they can't fathom that a man might love their progeny, feel responsibility towards it, and most of all, have any right whatsoever as a parent.
It's so unfathomably nonsensical that they don't even acknowledge the father's existence. It takes two to have a baby, and the baby is exactly the man's as it is the woman's, yet the man is forced to pay when the woman wants him to and the man has no say in whatever the baby lives or not. It's even stupider when the parent they picked to be responsible for this choice is the one who can't think rationally at all. And they say it is equal rights? Isn't it more equal when none of the two can choose? I know I'm rambling about leftist ideology being inconsistent like it's not the norm but come on. If you go by the sick idea that the child belongs to the parents and they can do whatever they want because of that, why pick the one that is just a bigger child? Also also, if mothers deserve this absolute power, why is it evil to bot let your child be groomed? Why do they want to take children away from what they claim to be abusive parents? I thought mothers have the authority to terminate their child's life when they want, why can't they abuse them? And if we should take kids from their abusive parents why can't we take children from the mothers who want to kill them? Of course we can't do that when they're in their womb but wouldn't the more sensible decision be to just wait until the child is born and then get them away? Why is everything so stupid? Why isn't everyone forced to marry the people they have a child with? So that the dad can be a dad and the mother can be a mother? Like God intended? Is this so fucking hard to get? Oh I'm sorry you want to sleep with chad every night and be an independent woman by day. How the fuck are you independent if your entire existence revolves around pleasure you get from men that are not you? Think about that sara, you fucking whore, oh my bad I forgot women don't think, then maybe you can't be independent and you should let a man decide, pheraps not a nigger with the superpower of ceasing to exist when approached by the prospect of being civilized. Oh but you want to study science and e a scientist who will be remembered? You will be remembered, as a fucking idiot clueless godless whore goy.