Hahaha, I couldn't be further from a socialist, although people do often confuse me for a tankie and I rarely correct them as a way of hiding my power level. All labels are poor, but if I had to pick I'm a post-modern traditionalist looking for a Caesar worthy of serving.
I'm guessing you're a lolbertarian, aka a socialist handmaiden. The insistence of lolberts to reject the use of power is why the poz will continue it's march of deluezian territorialization. Heirarchy is intrinsic to man, and must be embraced for any civilization to flourish. You're doomed to live in the pod and eat the bugs.
I'm a fan of theocratic monarchism. The core dispute I have with socialism, the bastard off-spring of liberalism, is that man is not perfectable by the proper application of materialist theory. From there, all else follows.
Rousseau is fundamentally wrong about the natural state of man being his best and civilization being the root of evil. Destroying heirarchy and institutions of authority is the opposite of freedom. It is a vicious atomizing enslavement, which is a good demonstration that capitalism is not the opposite of socialism since they share the same hedonistic materialist conclusion.
Also, Austrian economics is 100% correct, but it must be remembered that it is value-free and non-presciptive. Many people forget that Ricardo's explication of free trade assumes that capital and people are statically contained within the nation, which is why there is no reason Mises cannot be synthesized with List.
What is your dispute with socialism and how do you propose to stop it?
A family becomes the fucking owners/state ! And everybody else can either suck their dick or go fuck themselves .
is that man is not perfectable by the proper application of materialist theory. From there, all else follows.
You clearly need to eat shit ! man is not perfectable . POINT. You want PERFECTION ? Or to "perfect" others ? Yeah you are a piece of shit that needs to hang. FUCK YOU SOCIALIST SCUM !
What is your dispute with socialism and how do you propose to stop it?
You don't stop it. Once it took hold it's impossible to root it out without a collapse. It's that simple. AND THAT is THE FINAL CONCLUSION whenever a form of socialism (STATE CONTROL) is attempted . ALWAYS .
Because socialism is in ESSENCE CORRUPTION . Because power doesn't come from ones ECONOMIC accomplishments but from the distribution of what OTHERS have accomplished . That destroys the drive to create and ultimately rots the work force ... AND THE SYSTEM COLLAPSES !
You can clearly see it in the evolution of THE USSR !
Just eat shit socialist ! Eat IT !
Hahaha, I couldn't be further from a socialist, although people do often confuse me for a tankie and I rarely correct them as a way of hiding my power level. All labels are poor, but if I had to pick I'm a post-modern traditionalist looking for a Caesar worthy of serving.
I'm guessing you're a lolbertarian, aka a socialist handmaiden. The insistence of lolberts to reject the use of power is why the poz will continue it's march of deluezian territorialization. Heirarchy is intrinsic to man, and must be embraced for any civilization to flourish. You're doomed to live in the pod and eat the bugs.
Quite curios HOW THE FUCK COULD YOU EVEN SAY THAT ! =)) What exactly makes you NOT SOCIALIST ?
I'm a fan of theocratic monarchism. The core dispute I have with socialism, the bastard off-spring of liberalism, is that man is not perfectable by the proper application of materialist theory. From there, all else follows.
Rousseau is fundamentally wrong about the natural state of man being his best and civilization being the root of evil. Destroying heirarchy and institutions of authority is the opposite of freedom. It is a vicious atomizing enslavement, which is a good demonstration that capitalism is not the opposite of socialism since they share the same hedonistic materialist conclusion.
Also, Austrian economics is 100% correct, but it must be remembered that it is value-free and non-presciptive. Many people forget that Ricardo's explication of free trade assumes that capital and people are statically contained within the nation, which is why there is no reason Mises cannot be synthesized with List.
What is your dispute with socialism and how do you propose to stop it?
And HOW THE FUCK is that not socialism !
A family becomes the fucking owners/state ! And everybody else can either suck their dick or go fuck themselves .
You clearly need to eat shit ! man is not perfectable . POINT. You want PERFECTION ? Or to "perfect" others ? Yeah you are a piece of shit that needs to hang. FUCK YOU SOCIALIST SCUM !
You don't stop it. Once it took hold it's impossible to root it out without a collapse. It's that simple. AND THAT is THE FINAL CONCLUSION whenever a form of socialism (STATE CONTROL) is attempted . ALWAYS .
Because socialism is in ESSENCE CORRUPTION . Because power doesn't come from ones ECONOMIC accomplishments but from the distribution of what OTHERS have accomplished . That destroys the drive to create and ultimately rots the work force ... AND THE SYSTEM COLLAPSES !
You can clearly see it in the evolution of THE USSR !