I'm a fan of theocratic monarchism. The core dispute I have with socialism, the bastard off-spring of liberalism, is that man is not perfectable by the proper application of materialist theory. From there, all else follows.
Rousseau is fundamentally wrong about the natural state of man being his best and civilization being the root of evil. Destroying heirarchy and institutions of authority is the opposite of freedom. It is a vicious atomizing enslavement, which is a good demonstration that capitalism is not the opposite of socialism since they share the same hedonistic materialist conclusion.
Also, Austrian economics is 100% correct, but it must be remembered that it is value-free and non-presciptive. Many people forget that Ricardo's explication of free trade assumes that capital and people are statically contained within the nation, which is why there is no reason Mises cannot be synthesized with List.
What is your dispute with socialism and how do you propose to stop it?
A family becomes the fucking owners/state ! And everybody else can either suck their dick or go fuck themselves .
is that man is not perfectable by the proper application of materialist theory. From there, all else follows.
You clearly need to eat shit ! man is not perfectable . POINT. You want PERFECTION ? Or to "perfect" others ? Yeah you are a piece of shit that needs to hang. FUCK YOU SOCIALIST SCUM !
What is your dispute with socialism and how do you propose to stop it?
You don't stop it. Once it took hold it's impossible to root it out without a collapse. It's that simple. AND THAT is THE FINAL CONCLUSION whenever a form of socialism (STATE CONTROL) is attempted . ALWAYS .
Because socialism is in ESSENCE CORRUPTION . Because power doesn't come from ones ECONOMIC accomplishments but from the distribution of what OTHERS have accomplished . That destroys the drive to create and ultimately rots the work force ... AND THE SYSTEM COLLAPSES !
You can clearly see it in the evolution of THE USSR !
There's your problem. You conceive of any governing authority as having the power of a modern liberal state. An absolute fuedal monarch is far more limited in his power than a democratic state. Mass conscription isn't possible without a democratic political formula to justify itself as the will of the masses, as demonstrated well by the contrast of Napoleon and the coalition. The machinations of a king and his court does not touch the peasant, who can manage his piece of land as he pleases without applying for permits. Furthermore, it is in the interest of the Rex to uplift his people towards a better condition.
Heirarchy is not divorcable from society. Power should be prescient, which is to say formally invested such that responsibility lays bare. It is the impersonal disconnection between the rulers and their people that has degenerated society to this condition. You still cling to liberal myths, which is why you are fundamentally unable to oppose the progressive order.
Hoppe's Democracy The God That Failed is what you need, although I'm guessing you aren't a fan of reading books and just like sperging on the internet.
I'm a fan of theocratic monarchism. The core dispute I have with socialism, the bastard off-spring of liberalism, is that man is not perfectable by the proper application of materialist theory. From there, all else follows.
Rousseau is fundamentally wrong about the natural state of man being his best and civilization being the root of evil. Destroying heirarchy and institutions of authority is the opposite of freedom. It is a vicious atomizing enslavement, which is a good demonstration that capitalism is not the opposite of socialism since they share the same hedonistic materialist conclusion.
Also, Austrian economics is 100% correct, but it must be remembered that it is value-free and non-presciptive. Many people forget that Ricardo's explication of free trade assumes that capital and people are statically contained within the nation, which is why there is no reason Mises cannot be synthesized with List.
What is your dispute with socialism and how do you propose to stop it?
And HOW THE FUCK is that not socialism !
A family becomes the fucking owners/state ! And everybody else can either suck their dick or go fuck themselves .
You clearly need to eat shit ! man is not perfectable . POINT. You want PERFECTION ? Or to "perfect" others ? Yeah you are a piece of shit that needs to hang. FUCK YOU SOCIALIST SCUM !
You don't stop it. Once it took hold it's impossible to root it out without a collapse. It's that simple. AND THAT is THE FINAL CONCLUSION whenever a form of socialism (STATE CONTROL) is attempted . ALWAYS .
Because socialism is in ESSENCE CORRUPTION . Because power doesn't come from ones ECONOMIC accomplishments but from the distribution of what OTHERS have accomplished . That destroys the drive to create and ultimately rots the work force ... AND THE SYSTEM COLLAPSES !
You can clearly see it in the evolution of THE USSR !
There's your problem. You conceive of any governing authority as having the power of a modern liberal state. An absolute fuedal monarch is far more limited in his power than a democratic state. Mass conscription isn't possible without a democratic political formula to justify itself as the will of the masses, as demonstrated well by the contrast of Napoleon and the coalition. The machinations of a king and his court does not touch the peasant, who can manage his piece of land as he pleases without applying for permits. Furthermore, it is in the interest of the Rex to uplift his people towards a better condition.
Heirarchy is not divorcable from society. Power should be prescient, which is to say formally invested such that responsibility lays bare. It is the impersonal disconnection between the rulers and their people that has degenerated society to this condition. You still cling to liberal myths, which is why you are fundamentally unable to oppose the progressive order.
Hoppe's Democracy The God That Failed is what you need, although I'm guessing you aren't a fan of reading books and just like sperging on the internet.
Thanks for covering my laziness.
We are not in the midle ages anymore . Sorry .
You are a trained imecile dog ... which is why you are fundamentally unable to oppose those that claim authority. It's in your genes maybe.
I'm certainly not a fan of reading books about fantastic gods and utopias that the sheep like to believe in.
EAT THE SHIT MAN. Just eat it !