31 Imp, since you're finally back to us adoring fans: Surely you could define a woman? (twitter.com) posted 2 years ago by SupremeReader 2 years ago by SupremeReader +35 / -4 15 comments share 15 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You tryna get him banned again?
Kek
I think Rule 16 wouldn't like my answer.
Jesus Christ how many rules do you have?
I browse in a normal sized window so for me there's no rules.
Click report on a comment and "breaks KotakuInAction2's rules" and you'll see them all.
Oh man if they had only stopped at 15 you'd be in the clear.
What she really means is she had rape fantasies after seeing his comics.
It wasn't intended by the author. Women are just like that.
Women get turned on by this shit and they hate it because it makes it much harder to lie to themselves
I took the liberty of typing up a response that is in line with the rules here.
its funny cause we actually CANT define what a woman is these days cause apparently anyone can call themselves one.
At the end of them xer-splaining it to you be sure to add "that's dumb" before walking away.
I am actually OK with the nebulous nature of "woman". This means that men can identify as women and get access to undeserved privileges that has been garnered to the latter.
TRAs have done more for equality than 30 years of men's rights movement.