You should realize: The YGL and even the WEF are not nearly as (uniformly) nefarious as alt-media people like to think. Sure, the Davos set is shady as hell, but outside of that, it's like a 4H club for graduate students, especially business schools. The World Economic Council is like this too. Spooky in theory, really dull in practice.
I've been to WEF conferences. Not very interesting. Wear a 3-piece suit and eat a 5-course meal in the mid-morning while listening to some TED talk about currency. Impress an important person with your impeccable manners and ability to carry on trite conversation while waving a glass of champagne around, and get recognized for YGL, which is an up-jumped merit badge.
No doubt some matriculates of these things go on to do bigger and darker things. But just because you at some point got tagged by these enterprises--like an endangered penguin--doesn't mean you're a functioning agent of the NWO.
Put it this way: It's unlikely that Putin's YGL affiliation what made him interesting. But as a potent dude, it wasn't unlikely from him to have picked up that affiliation along the way.
Your story amounts to “because they didn’t recognize me as someone worth recruiting, I’ll gonna pretend I wasn’t interviewing for a position in the globalist cabal”.
Yes, it does. Openly stated, although it's kind of funny you take it as a gotcha.
The point was, most of this thing, and the overwhelming preponderance of the people who've ever had the tag attached to their name in some way, are no more nefarious than volunteers for Kiwanis, or Lion's Club, or somesuch. Sometimes people get their panties in a bunch over the Masons, when in reality, 99.9% of it is old men raising small amounts of money to buy winter boots for kids. Maybe there are Masons in blood-sketched basements making sacrifices to Moloch, but if a thing is what it does most often (which it is), this would be a stupid way to think about the thing that is Masons.
Something tells me you were not invited to any important or relevant conversations. Just the smoke-screen public front. Right, right. You sat down at tables with economic policy advisors to active governments. Whatever, son.
Okay. I mean, yes, I did, several times. Because if you're attending a b-school in a major City, as I was, this is a thing you're encouraged to do. If you're planning on going for Goldman Sachs, or Vanguard, or McKinsey, Deloitte, Booz Allen, etc etc., this is part of the "soft skills" program that you're supposed to be developing. It's utterly garden variety, and every year thousands--maybe tens of thousands--of grad students do the exact same thing. Just because you've not been party to it, doesn't make it exotic.
Maybe I wasn't invited to the "important or relevant" conversations; This is my point. Assuredly, because the bulk of the conversations aren't important or relevant.
I'm not sure why this is hard to get across, it comes back to the same premise: Just because someone at some point was recognized by these entities, does not make them an agent of these agencies. You should look to what else they've done and are doing. That YGL on the resume is nigh-meaningless: The most obvious actual meaning is that this person was at some point in the top 5% of their business class. I've got YGL on my Christmas card list, so I estimate that for every alumni ruling Russia or in the Senate, 99 are managing a small gas provider in upstate New York.
Okay, but what I'm trying to do here is clean up your process of recognizing who exactly is "involved in the wef." When I see someone point to YGL on a resume, or having been in the same room as Klaus Schwab at some point, and going on to consider that person indelibly compromised, it's an eye-roll.
I'm fine with us walking away from it each thinking the other's view on the subject is dumb as hell. But in reality, one of our perspectives is dumb as hell.
Kid, I pre-date KiA prime on plebbit. I just don't often bother even registering on these fly-by-night forums, because I think in years rather than days, and frankly most of the conversation is stupid and boring. This is probably due to the aggregate you.
Some people here believe in all sorts of conspiracy theories, and that everyone is out to get them. They are afraid of their own shadows and probably wear tinfoil hats. It is going to be very difficult to try and get through most of them.
Some of them love China and Russia more than America or the West.
Everything people like you called conspiracy theories became reality.
Global lockdowns, forced vaccinations, vaccine passports, mass mail in voter fraud, stopping count of votes and injecting votes at 3am, implementing a cbdc, open discussion of false flags.
Don't worry, your mental porn idea that trained pigeons will fly to Russia and spread a bioweapon on Russian citizens will happen... somehow! And that the earth is absolutely 1000% flat, it will happen! You said it yourself!
Hey, I'm not your buddy here, buddy. I love America, but there's something currently occupying it that I don't love even a little, and would like to see fail. If it has to fail throwing itself against China or Russia, then I hope that's what shall be. I think the people of America would be fine, and would be better off without this weird and evil international apparatus.
My purpose here was to add perspective where it's lacking. Apparently nobody else here has been to, or had a family member in, some metropolitan b-school program, because if they had they'd know this, so I thought I'd chime in.
It sounds outlandish I guess if you're not personally acquainted with it, so it's met how it's met, so so be it. You can't force somebody to take you at your word, or to accept something they're disinclined to.
Putin was a constant feature of Schwab'a events but he's old (70 this year).
You should realize: The YGL and even the WEF are not nearly as (uniformly) nefarious as alt-media people like to think. Sure, the Davos set is shady as hell, but outside of that, it's like a 4H club for graduate students, especially business schools. The World Economic Council is like this too. Spooky in theory, really dull in practice.
I've been to WEF conferences. Not very interesting. Wear a 3-piece suit and eat a 5-course meal in the mid-morning while listening to some TED talk about currency. Impress an important person with your impeccable manners and ability to carry on trite conversation while waving a glass of champagne around, and get recognized for YGL, which is an up-jumped merit badge.
No doubt some matriculates of these things go on to do bigger and darker things. But just because you at some point got tagged by these enterprises--like an endangered penguin--doesn't mean you're a functioning agent of the NWO.
Put it this way: It's unlikely that Putin's YGL affiliation what made him interesting. But as a potent dude, it wasn't unlikely from him to have picked up that affiliation along the way.
Fucking hilarious.
Your story amounts to “because they didn’t recognize me as someone worth recruiting, I’ll gonna pretend I wasn’t interviewing for a position in the globalist cabal”.
Yes, it does. Openly stated, although it's kind of funny you take it as a gotcha.
The point was, most of this thing, and the overwhelming preponderance of the people who've ever had the tag attached to their name in some way, are no more nefarious than volunteers for Kiwanis, or Lion's Club, or somesuch. Sometimes people get their panties in a bunch over the Masons, when in reality, 99.9% of it is old men raising small amounts of money to buy winter boots for kids. Maybe there are Masons in blood-sketched basements making sacrifices to Moloch, but if a thing is what it does most often (which it is), this would be a stupid way to think about the thing that is Masons.
You should read slower, or better.
Something tells me you were not invited to any important or relevant conversations. Just the smoke-screen public front. Right, right. You sat down at tables with economic policy advisors to active governments. Whatever, son.
Okay. I mean, yes, I did, several times. Because if you're attending a b-school in a major City, as I was, this is a thing you're encouraged to do. If you're planning on going for Goldman Sachs, or Vanguard, or McKinsey, Deloitte, Booz Allen, etc etc., this is part of the "soft skills" program that you're supposed to be developing. It's utterly garden variety, and every year thousands--maybe tens of thousands--of grad students do the exact same thing. Just because you've not been party to it, doesn't make it exotic.
Maybe I wasn't invited to the "important or relevant" conversations; This is my point. Assuredly, because the bulk of the conversations aren't important or relevant.
I'm not sure why this is hard to get across, it comes back to the same premise: Just because someone at some point was recognized by these entities, does not make them an agent of these agencies. You should look to what else they've done and are doing. That YGL on the resume is nigh-meaningless: The most obvious actual meaning is that this person was at some point in the top 5% of their business class. I've got YGL on my Christmas card list, so I estimate that for every alumni ruling Russia or in the Senate, 99 are managing a small gas provider in upstate New York.
everyone involved in the wef needs to die.
Okay, but what I'm trying to do here is clean up your process of recognizing who exactly is "involved in the wef." When I see someone point to YGL on a resume, or having been in the same room as Klaus Schwab at some point, and going on to consider that person indelibly compromised, it's an eye-roll.
I'm fine with us walking away from it each thinking the other's view on the subject is dumb as hell. But in reality, one of our perspectives is dumb as hell.
compromised is compromised.
Fuck off handshake.
Kid, I pre-date KiA prime on plebbit. I just don't often bother even registering on these fly-by-night forums, because I think in years rather than days, and frankly most of the conversation is stupid and boring. This is probably due to the aggregate you.
You predate nothing. Shut up.
and yet here you are smelling fishy as fuck while posting of a fly-by-night forum
Some people here believe in all sorts of conspiracy theories, and that everyone is out to get them. They are afraid of their own shadows and probably wear tinfoil hats. It is going to be very difficult to try and get through most of them.
Some of them love China and Russia more than America or the West.
Have you been awake for the last three years?
Everything people like you called conspiracy theories became reality.
Global lockdowns, forced vaccinations, vaccine passports, mass mail in voter fraud, stopping count of votes and injecting votes at 3am, implementing a cbdc, open discussion of false flags.
How can you be so fucking ignorant?
He's a liar, that's how.
Weird, I never called those conspiracy theories.
How can you be so fucking ignorant?
I like how you’re perpetually stuck in 2012.
I like it how you are more loyal to Russia and China than America or Europe.
Oh look, someone on a GG forum using the phrase "conspiracy theory" as a weapon to discredit things they don't like.
If there's anything we've learned from GG it's that "conspiracy theory" is in no way equivalent to "false".
Don't worry, your mental porn idea that trained pigeons will fly to Russia and spread a bioweapon on Russian citizens will happen... somehow! And that the earth is absolutely 1000% flat, it will happen! You said it yourself!
Hey, I'm not your buddy here, buddy. I love America, but there's something currently occupying it that I don't love even a little, and would like to see fail. If it has to fail throwing itself against China or Russia, then I hope that's what shall be. I think the people of America would be fine, and would be better off without this weird and evil international apparatus.
My purpose here was to add perspective where it's lacking. Apparently nobody else here has been to, or had a family member in, some metropolitan b-school program, because if they had they'd know this, so I thought I'd chime in.
It sounds outlandish I guess if you're not personally acquainted with it, so it's met how it's met, so so be it. You can't force somebody to take you at your word, or to accept something they're disinclined to.