Unfortunately, public opinion would say that it's worth it to potentially prevent the next outbreak. This could very well end up long-term like the flu, where they just make a gamble on a vex to produce and distribute, make a big campaign of "get ur jab," and walk away as there's no accountability for bad luck.
So, you're going to start trials of shots against things that are not yet causing problems? What could possibly go wrong?!
Unfortunately, public opinion would say that it's worth it to potentially prevent the next outbreak. This could very well end up long-term like the flu, where they just make a gamble on a vex to produce and distribute, make a big campaign of "get ur jab," and walk away as there's no accountability for bad luck.
Speaking of which, we apparently got it wrong for the flu this year.
Kinda seems to me they get it wrong every year
What could possibly go wrong? Well, they have a list of things they want to try releasing...