California courts have constructed legal precedent such that Section 230 gives Twitter the ability to do whatever the hell it wants. They let all of big tech do whatever the hell they want, really.
Congress is going to have to step in and add some language to the law that courts can't bafflegarble their way around.
Could this be grounds for a libel/slander lawsuit? at least in a world where the courts actually do their job anyway.
Laws exist to protect the ruling classes from you, not to protect you from its mad dogs.
Big Tech told court their "fact checks" are just opinions.
California courts have constructed legal precedent such that Section 230 gives Twitter the ability to do whatever the hell it wants. They let all of big tech do whatever the hell they want, really.
Congress is going to have to step in and add some language to the law that courts can't bafflegarble their way around.