That's why they blamed the loss of women's "virtue" on Jewish influence.
Yes, and today the loss of women's virtue is blamed on... ?
You know the MRA argument very well. It's the exact same thing minus one step. Modern society is broken and allows for women to place their faith in government instead of their husband or their God.
That's what the book burnings were about, the idea that if you make bad words disappear, you don't have to hold people accountable for acting on them.
Not really.
It was an act of catharsis meant to bring together the community while getting rid of degenerate porn and subversive materials. The vast majority of what was burnt was either communist writings or LGBTQIAP++ type woke garbage.
People still use the same arguments now - that women are just brainwashed to support the anti-male policy today.
To them I give only one example that definitively proves you cannot spend your way into being supported.
In what way are these two points even related, man?
Michael Bloomberg failed because he was already unliked and his public appearances were awful. His answers to questions were outright awful and he came off like an idiot half the time.
You can buy a position easy enough but you need to not come off as a worthless liar and/or a faggot when you show up in public. Nobody from the left nor the right liked him. It also didn't help at all that everyone already knew he controlled parts of the media, as opposed to people who have at least a degree of separation.
He'd have won zero states in a Presidential Election, no matter what he spent.
Put Joe Figurehead in instead and coach him to not act like a massive faggot and Bloomberg would have probably won much more. Guy let his ego get the best of him and lost for it.
You wrote the point without me being involved.
You're already half way there, my friend.
Once you pass through the tunnel of "it was women" you'll arrive at the most logical conclusion.
Same for when you stop blaming everything from the rain to your stubbed toe on da Joooz.
I don't blame it all on da juice.
I just point out their inordinate influence and in-group preference.
Not at all.
The NatSoc movement knew well that women could be evil.
You misunderstand the point of my words and instead equate it with a specific ideology.
It's okay.
You'll soon work past it.
Truth itself shall guide your hand.
Yes, and today the loss of women's virtue is blamed on... ?
You know the MRA argument very well. It's the exact same thing minus one step. Modern society is broken and allows for women to place their faith in government instead of their husband or their God.
Not really.
It was an act of catharsis meant to bring together the community while getting rid of degenerate porn and subversive materials. The vast majority of what was burnt was either communist writings or LGBTQIAP++ type woke garbage.
In what way are these two points even related, man?
Michael Bloomberg failed because he was already unliked and his public appearances were awful. His answers to questions were outright awful and he came off like an idiot half the time.
You can buy a position easy enough but you need to not come off as a worthless liar and/or a faggot when you show up in public. Nobody from the left nor the right liked him. It also didn't help at all that everyone already knew he controlled parts of the media, as opposed to people who have at least a degree of separation.
Put Joe Figurehead in instead and coach him to not act like a massive faggot and Bloomberg would have probably won much more. Guy let his ego get the best of him and lost for it.
Again, though, completely unrelated points.