They absolutely are. They just don't like when people do to them what they do to others.
The 9-year-old girls who have someone's penis shoved in their face are not the ones doing it. So there's no need for you to defend an evil by saying 'ea quoque'.
She still won't end up imprisoned. The time she's waiting for sentencing will be all she gets.
She's awaiting sentencing... in prison. But I see you've already moved on to your next prediction, that she will spend a day in prison, but that she will get a suspended sentence. I guess your next one will be that the governor will pardon her.
Yes, even Dr Money himself said he was working with them and those who opposed his work wanted women in the kitchen.
I don't get it, what are you saying?
I just got the wrong state. It was Iowa I was thinking of. I think the governor or something like that from one of the Dakotas was/is a woman and that's how I got confused.
Both Iowa and South Dakota have a female governor - the latter being an atrocity, the former not so much.
Bet on that. That'll go down as worse than my first prediction about Kim Potter.
Are you still willing to take the bet if I say no country in Europe and the Americas (+South Korea, Taiwan & Japan)? I have no idea if Tanzania or China will do it.
Why do you use "think of the children" as an argument? It doesn't even work, because the spa incident shouldn't have happened. Why was a child allowed to be around naked adults in the first place? Are women considered less likely to be pedophiles? Why are people focusing on the tranny and not the possibility of lesbian pedophiles ogling a naked child? What kind of warped culture thinks that's okay?
Time served.
I'm saying that when Dr Money created gender theory, he was acting based off the input of feminist allies who in return covered when his pedophilic journal Paidika was revealed to the public.
Ah, yes, South Dakota's governor. That's the one that said she wouldn't oppose vax mandates at companies because the unvaxxed can work elsewhere, isn't it.
I already know the next two will be Chile and Portugal. It could come to a point where every feminist-aligned country already has one by 2023.
Why do you use "think of the children" as an argument? It doesn't even work
Eh, it does work, as no rational person believes a sick pervert should be allowed to wave his dick into a 9-year-old girl's face.
Time served.
Time served != will not spend one day.
I'm saying that when Dr Money created gender theory, he was acting based off the input of feminist allies who in return covered when his pedophilic journal Paidika was revealed to the public.
Wouldn't surprise me.
Ah, yes, South Dakota's governor. That's the one that said she wouldn't oppose vax mandates at companies because the unvaxxed can work elsewhere, isn't it.
She's a Chamber of Commerce shill.
I already know the next two will be Chile and Portugal. It could come to a point where every feminist-aligned country already has one by 2023.
That's the entire Western world, right? That bet I'll take.
No rational person should believe children can be allowed near any naked adults. It still disturbs me that people consider adults and children being naked together normal. Have they never heard of changing cubicles?
I didn't know they made her wait in prison.
Or me. MeToo was led by a pedophile, Simone De Beauvoir was a pedophile too. Feminists love pedophiles. Maybe their weird fascination with "men's invasion of girls locker rooms" is yet another projection, this time of their fantasies of ogling little girls.
No, she's just a typical female leader. "Fuck you, we're alright" should be their slogan. If it affected women, she wouldn't even consider a mandate. That's what sickens me most about them, that they will gladly inflict harm, but only targeted harm. They aren't merely psychopathic, but ideologically sadistic.
I think some places will not have mandates. Either as a way to honeypot "anti-vaxxers" into a bad situation or because their government hasn't been compromised.
No rational person should believe children can be allowed near any naked adults. It still disturbs me that people consider adults and children being naked together normal. Have they never heard of changing cubicles?
That is a surprisingly strong statement. But good.
I didn't know they made her wait in prison.
Neither did I. The issue is that you are very confident making wrong prediction after wrong prediction without even evaluating what kind of preconceptions let to those errors. When I get something wrong, I think: OK, where did I go wrong here. You just go to the next, and next, and next prediction without skipping a beat.
No, she's just a typical female leader. "Fuck you, we're alright" should be their slogan. If it affected women, she wouldn't even consider a mandate.
The coronavirus does affect women, just men more than women.
Also, I'm pretty sure you can't read minds. This is just the Chamber of Commerce position.
I think some places will not have mandates. Either as a way to honeypot "anti-vaxxers" into a bad situation or because their government hasn't been compromised.
I am really surprised that you are not absolutely miserable with this belief system.
The 9-year-old girls who have someone's penis shoved in their face are not the ones doing it. So there's no need for you to defend an evil by saying 'ea quoque'.
She's awaiting sentencing... in prison. But I see you've already moved on to your next prediction, that she will spend a day in prison, but that she will get a suspended sentence. I guess your next one will be that the governor will pardon her.
I don't get it, what are you saying?
Both Iowa and South Dakota have a female governor - the latter being an atrocity, the former not so much.
Are you still willing to take the bet if I say no country in Europe and the Americas (+South Korea, Taiwan & Japan)? I have no idea if Tanzania or China will do it.
Why do you use "think of the children" as an argument? It doesn't even work, because the spa incident shouldn't have happened. Why was a child allowed to be around naked adults in the first place? Are women considered less likely to be pedophiles? Why are people focusing on the tranny and not the possibility of lesbian pedophiles ogling a naked child? What kind of warped culture thinks that's okay?
Time served.
I'm saying that when Dr Money created gender theory, he was acting based off the input of feminist allies who in return covered when his pedophilic journal Paidika was revealed to the public.
Ah, yes, South Dakota's governor. That's the one that said she wouldn't oppose vax mandates at companies because the unvaxxed can work elsewhere, isn't it.
I already know the next two will be Chile and Portugal. It could come to a point where every feminist-aligned country already has one by 2023.
Eh, it does work, as no rational person believes a sick pervert should be allowed to wave his dick into a 9-year-old girl's face.
Time served != will not spend one day.
Wouldn't surprise me.
She's a Chamber of Commerce shill.
That's the entire Western world, right? That bet I'll take.
No rational person should believe children can be allowed near any naked adults. It still disturbs me that people consider adults and children being naked together normal. Have they never heard of changing cubicles?
I didn't know they made her wait in prison.
Or me. MeToo was led by a pedophile, Simone De Beauvoir was a pedophile too. Feminists love pedophiles. Maybe their weird fascination with "men's invasion of girls locker rooms" is yet another projection, this time of their fantasies of ogling little girls.
No, she's just a typical female leader. "Fuck you, we're alright" should be their slogan. If it affected women, she wouldn't even consider a mandate. That's what sickens me most about them, that they will gladly inflict harm, but only targeted harm. They aren't merely psychopathic, but ideologically sadistic.
I think some places will not have mandates. Either as a way to honeypot "anti-vaxxers" into a bad situation or because their government hasn't been compromised.
That is a surprisingly strong statement. But good.
Neither did I. The issue is that you are very confident making wrong prediction after wrong prediction without even evaluating what kind of preconceptions let to those errors. When I get something wrong, I think: OK, where did I go wrong here. You just go to the next, and next, and next prediction without skipping a beat.
The coronavirus does affect women, just men more than women.
Also, I'm pretty sure you can't read minds. This is just the Chamber of Commerce position.
I am really surprised that you are not absolutely miserable with this belief system.