Why do you use "think of the children" as an argument? It doesn't even work
Eh, it does work, as no rational person believes a sick pervert should be allowed to wave his dick into a 9-year-old girl's face.
Time served.
Time served != will not spend one day.
I'm saying that when Dr Money created gender theory, he was acting based off the input of feminist allies who in return covered when his pedophilic journal Paidika was revealed to the public.
Wouldn't surprise me.
Ah, yes, South Dakota's governor. That's the one that said she wouldn't oppose vax mandates at companies because the unvaxxed can work elsewhere, isn't it.
She's a Chamber of Commerce shill.
I already know the next two will be Chile and Portugal. It could come to a point where every feminist-aligned country already has one by 2023.
That's the entire Western world, right? That bet I'll take.
No rational person should believe children can be allowed near any naked adults. It still disturbs me that people consider adults and children being naked together normal. Have they never heard of changing cubicles?
That is a surprisingly strong statement. But good.
I didn't know they made her wait in prison.
Neither did I. The issue is that you are very confident making wrong prediction after wrong prediction without even evaluating what kind of preconceptions let to those errors. When I get something wrong, I think: OK, where did I go wrong here. You just go to the next, and next, and next prediction without skipping a beat.
No, she's just a typical female leader. "Fuck you, we're alright" should be their slogan. If it affected women, she wouldn't even consider a mandate.
The coronavirus does affect women, just men more than women.
Also, I'm pretty sure you can't read minds. This is just the Chamber of Commerce position.
I think some places will not have mandates. Either as a way to honeypot "anti-vaxxers" into a bad situation or because their government hasn't been compromised.
I am really surprised that you are not absolutely miserable with this belief system.
I do have some strong beliefs that don't relate to our "better" halves.
Who commits most crimes, despite getting harsher sentences? The worse halves indeed.
I'm confident because I know that I have the right logic, I just overestimate how far they'll go sometimes.
Every one of the few correct prediction that you have made is far more consistent with a more rational worldview than "women are trying to kill me".
I don't need to read minds, women in power are incredibly predictable.
Only with your confirmation bias.
For example, why didn't your Iowa devil vote against Kavanaaugh? Oh, let me predict, she knew beforehand that he was a 'feminist plant'. But then why did the avowed feminist not do so?
Our misery is what they want. Why would I give it to them?
Eh, it does work, as no rational person believes a sick pervert should be allowed to wave his dick into a 9-year-old girl's face.
Time served != will not spend one day.
Wouldn't surprise me.
She's a Chamber of Commerce shill.
That's the entire Western world, right? That bet I'll take.
That is a surprisingly strong statement. But good.
Neither did I. The issue is that you are very confident making wrong prediction after wrong prediction without even evaluating what kind of preconceptions let to those errors. When I get something wrong, I think: OK, where did I go wrong here. You just go to the next, and next, and next prediction without skipping a beat.
The coronavirus does affect women, just men more than women.
Also, I'm pretty sure you can't read minds. This is just the Chamber of Commerce position.
I am really surprised that you are not absolutely miserable with this belief system.
Who commits most crimes, despite getting harsher sentences? The worse halves indeed.
Every one of the few correct prediction that you have made is far more consistent with a more rational worldview than "women are trying to kill me".
Only with your confirmation bias.
For example, why didn't your Iowa devil vote against Kavanaaugh? Oh, let me predict, she knew beforehand that he was a 'feminist plant'. But then why did the avowed feminist not do so?
I mean, you're obsessed with 'them'.