The Soviet satellite states that they violently subjugated for decades until the USSR collapsed? Well that's the fun thing about communism, once the revolution happens you don't allow people the freedom to debate whether communism is beneficial to the people. There's no reason to infiltrate any country already under your sphere of influence; and it turns out living under communism sours you on that form of political economics.
I don't know where you're going with this but it did help that we were separated geographically from the USSR whereas the Balkan states and Eastern Europe were not so lucky. I also wouldn't say that there's no violent subjugation going on here, as though thugs don't routinely attack anyone to the right of Stalin. The one advantage we have is privately owned firearms, and gun confiscation was usually one of the first acts the communists would do after they took over an area.
I don't know where you're going with this but it did help that we were separated geographically from the USSR whereas the Balkan states and Eastern Europe were not so lucky.
OK.
How does that help the USSR control your politics? Why didn't they use the 'brilliant' tactics they used on your country on their own neighbors?
You can't face reality, and you can't take responsibility.
I also wouldn't say that there's no violent subjugation going on here, as though thugs don't routinely attack anyone to the right of Stalin.
Yes, that is what I said. You expect me to believe that the people who couldn't control their neighbors, who couldn't control themselves, somehow 'infiltrated' a country across the other side of the globe - so that it's still under their sway 30 years after their collapse.
How come they 'infiltrated' America more successfully than their own satellites?
The Soviet satellite states that they violently subjugated for decades until the USSR collapsed? Well that's the fun thing about communism, once the revolution happens you don't allow people the freedom to debate whether communism is beneficial to the people. There's no reason to infiltrate any country already under your sphere of influence; and it turns out living under communism sours you on that form of political economics.
Slow tap... why did they need to 'violently subjugate' those states and why did they disappear as satellite states as soon as this stopped?
How come America is going to worse shit without any violent subjugation?
I don't know where you're going with this but it did help that we were separated geographically from the USSR whereas the Balkan states and Eastern Europe were not so lucky. I also wouldn't say that there's no violent subjugation going on here, as though thugs don't routinely attack anyone to the right of Stalin. The one advantage we have is privately owned firearms, and gun confiscation was usually one of the first acts the communists would do after they took over an area.
OK.
How does that help the USSR control your politics? Why didn't they use the 'brilliant' tactics they used on your country on their own neighbors?
You can't face reality, and you can't take responsibility.
Yes, that is what I said. You expect me to believe that the people who couldn't control their neighbors, who couldn't control themselves, somehow 'infiltrated' a country across the other side of the globe - so that it's still under their sway 30 years after their collapse.