Are you serious? I've got thousands invested in all kinds of stuff myself, and I'm a poorfag from the post-commie part of Europe, our mean wage is like 1/3 of the same in Germany or Austria. Don't get me wrong, MTG seems like a grifter, but whining about thousands of dollars... pick a better way to attack her my man.
It'd be as hypocritical as the people claiming China is evil having a nice large stock holding in Tencent.
I don't see that as hypocritical either. You don't have to like a country or company to hold stock in it.
When your career is dedicated to opposing something, you can't then be benefiting from the success of it.
I mean, I know full well that this is just an ad hoc reason to say 'woman bad'. But all sorts of people who do not like the vaccine benefit from it all the same. For example, if more people have immunity due to the vaccine, this means Covid causes less damage, which leads to a reopening which in turn benefits everyone, including people who may not like it. Furthermore, is she even opposed to the vaccine, let alone having dedicated her career to it?
Is it just me that avoids investments purely for political reasons? Having integrity is hard, I suppose. Saying that, I decided to begrudgingly add AMD to my portfolio at the last dip to 130. Probably could have got it far lower, but I have faith that it will perform...mainly because Intel is a circus that thinks they can get away with not paying people if they don't get the jab.
Yes, she definitely has. The last few months have been just her pretending to be helping the anti-vax movement while actively making it look stupid.
You can't avoid passively benefiting from the removal of restrictions, but you can avoid putting your money into Pfizer stock, as I did. I lost a huge amount of potential gains selling at ~$42, but I have a clear conscience.
Is it just me that avoids investments purely for political reasons?
Unlikely, but you may have the misprision that buying a company's stock benefits the company. It really doesn't. The question is whether you will reap the benefits, or... women.
Saying that, I decided to begrudgingly add AMD to my portfolio at the last dip to 130
130 is a dip now? I bought AMD a while back at $2.
mainly because Intel is a circus that thinks they can get away with not paying people if they don't get the jab.
Look, making investment decisions based on ideology is quite a bad idea. You'll end up losing money. But at least you are not shorting Intel.
Yes, she definitely has. The last few months have been just her pretending to be helping the anti-vax movement while actively making it look stupid.
The anti-vax movement really doesn't need any help looking stupid. Also, your article only says that she is not vaccinated, which she has every right to not be, and that she denounces those who are forcing vaccinations down people's throat, which she is also right about. This does not make her "anti-vax".
At least be honest and say that you don't like her because she is a woman.
You can't avoid passively benefiting from the removal of restrictions, but you can avoid putting your money into Pfizer stock, as I did. I lost a huge amount of potential gains selling at ~$42, but I have a clear conscience.
Technically it does. Issuing more shares allows an injection of funds, as most of the airlines did to get over their huge 2020 losses. However, it's obvious that if you don't buy it, someone else will. That's how the market works. I'm just personally more comfortable not profiting off people's misery. Same reason I don't own Raytheon.
Yes, $130 is a dip now. It's a ~$150 stock with target prices in the mid 200s (which I don't believe.)
It's worked well for me so far. The only time it didn't work was shorting AstraZeneca, and I made that back shorting Goolag before a major Fed decision. Shorting ATVI is also going pretty well. I probably should have closed it a while ago, but I'm still up. I'm definitely not going to jump into leveraged shorts against every company I hate like I'm trying to wage war against them.
I've always considered her a grifter. She's profiting off vaccines being shoved down people's throats.
Because they didn't buy in the first place? It honestly occupied a lot of my mind while I had it, even though it was tiny compared to my major holdings at the time, which were Realty Income and Microsoft. I just felt dirty making money off people shifting poison.
Almost all of the Republicans are pro-vax aren't they? They still haven't sold me on why it's necessary for kids or young and healthy adults. That's even if I were to give them the assumption that it's even useful at all.
We should be holding those who made the virus accountable, not fighting one another.
I agree. So can we hold the 100% female team at WIV and all their feminist enablers accountable?
Oh, you just mean go fight the Chinese so your type can pleasure yourselves to the death count now you're safe from the draft. Right.
I bet you wouldn't want to "hold China accountable" if it was women forced to die defending shitty feminist hellholes like Taiwan.
Allowing the provision to draft women to be removed from the NDAA was a huge own goal. Just the threat of it stopped them trying to start wars. Now the EU is trying to start one in Ukraine and their grifters in the US want one with China.
Are you serious? I've got thousands invested in all kinds of stuff myself, and I'm a poorfag from the post-commie part of Europe, our mean wage is like 1/3 of the same in Germany or Austria. Don't get me wrong, MTG seems like a grifter, but whining about thousands of dollars... pick a better way to attack her my man.
I'm guessing you don't have it invested into enemies of ours, right?
MA. PG. GOOGL.
Wow, thousands.
It should be zero.
That is your opinion.
It'd be as hypocritical as the people claiming China is evil having a nice large stock holding in Tencent.
When your career is dedicated to opposing something, you can't then be benefiting from the success of it.
I don't see that as hypocritical either. You don't have to like a country or company to hold stock in it.
I mean, I know full well that this is just an ad hoc reason to say 'woman bad'. But all sorts of people who do not like the vaccine benefit from it all the same. For example, if more people have immunity due to the vaccine, this means Covid causes less damage, which leads to a reopening which in turn benefits everyone, including people who may not like it. Furthermore, is she even opposed to the vaccine, let alone having dedicated her career to it?
Is it just me that avoids investments purely for political reasons? Having integrity is hard, I suppose. Saying that, I decided to begrudgingly add AMD to my portfolio at the last dip to 130. Probably could have got it far lower, but I have faith that it will perform...mainly because Intel is a circus that thinks they can get away with not paying people if they don't get the jab.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/rep-marjorie-taylor-greene-says-shes-not-vaccinated-rips-vaccine-nazis/ar-AAQf2fi?ocid=BingNewsSearch
Yes, she definitely has. The last few months have been just her pretending to be helping the anti-vax movement while actively making it look stupid.
You can't avoid passively benefiting from the removal of restrictions, but you can avoid putting your money into Pfizer stock, as I did. I lost a huge amount of potential gains selling at ~$42, but I have a clear conscience.
Unlikely, but you may have the misprision that buying a company's stock benefits the company. It really doesn't. The question is whether you will reap the benefits, or... women.
130 is a dip now? I bought AMD a while back at $2.
Look, making investment decisions based on ideology is quite a bad idea. You'll end up losing money. But at least you are not shorting Intel.
The anti-vax movement really doesn't need any help looking stupid. Also, your article only says that she is not vaccinated, which she has every right to not be, and that she denounces those who are forcing vaccinations down people's throat, which she is also right about. This does not make her "anti-vax".
At least be honest and say that you don't like her because she is a woman.
As do people who did not sell.
Technically it does. Issuing more shares allows an injection of funds, as most of the airlines did to get over their huge 2020 losses. However, it's obvious that if you don't buy it, someone else will. That's how the market works. I'm just personally more comfortable not profiting off people's misery. Same reason I don't own Raytheon.
Yes, $130 is a dip now. It's a ~$150 stock with target prices in the mid 200s (which I don't believe.)
It's worked well for me so far. The only time it didn't work was shorting AstraZeneca, and I made that back shorting Goolag before a major Fed decision. Shorting ATVI is also going pretty well. I probably should have closed it a while ago, but I'm still up. I'm definitely not going to jump into leveraged shorts against every company I hate like I'm trying to wage war against them.
I've always considered her a grifter. She's profiting off vaccines being shoved down people's throats.
Because they didn't buy in the first place? It honestly occupied a lot of my mind while I had it, even though it was tiny compared to my major holdings at the time, which were Realty Income and Microsoft. I just felt dirty making money off people shifting poison.
Of course she does. Anyone that loud and obnoxious is clearly a grifter. Been saying this since I first heard of this bitch.
Almost all of the Republicans are pro-vax aren't they? They still haven't sold me on why it's necessary for kids or young and healthy adults. That's even if I were to give them the assumption that it's even useful at all.
Yeah (pretty much) any public figure is pro vaxx. They know who pays the bills and what happens if they don't toe the line.
I am in no way defending the GOP, but who among them has actually argued in favor of forcing the vaccine on kids? Or even healthy adults?
I agree. So can we hold the 100% female team at WIV and all their feminist enablers accountable?
Oh, you just mean go fight the Chinese so your type can pleasure yourselves to the death count now you're safe from the draft. Right.
I bet you wouldn't want to "hold China accountable" if it was women forced to die defending shitty feminist hellholes like Taiwan.
Allowing the provision to draft women to be removed from the NDAA was a huge own goal. Just the threat of it stopped them trying to start wars. Now the EU is trying to start one in Ukraine and their grifters in the US want one with China.