It'd be as hypocritical as the people claiming China is evil having a nice large stock holding in Tencent.
I don't see that as hypocritical either. You don't have to like a country or company to hold stock in it.
When your career is dedicated to opposing something, you can't then be benefiting from the success of it.
I mean, I know full well that this is just an ad hoc reason to say 'woman bad'. But all sorts of people who do not like the vaccine benefit from it all the same. For example, if more people have immunity due to the vaccine, this means Covid causes less damage, which leads to a reopening which in turn benefits everyone, including people who may not like it. Furthermore, is she even opposed to the vaccine, let alone having dedicated her career to it?
Is it just me that avoids investments purely for political reasons? Having integrity is hard, I suppose. Saying that, I decided to begrudgingly add AMD to my portfolio at the last dip to 130. Probably could have got it far lower, but I have faith that it will perform...mainly because Intel is a circus that thinks they can get away with not paying people if they don't get the jab.
Yes, she definitely has. The last few months have been just her pretending to be helping the anti-vax movement while actively making it look stupid.
You can't avoid passively benefiting from the removal of restrictions, but you can avoid putting your money into Pfizer stock, as I did. I lost a huge amount of potential gains selling at ~$42, but I have a clear conscience.
It should be zero.
That is your opinion.
It'd be as hypocritical as the people claiming China is evil having a nice large stock holding in Tencent.
When your career is dedicated to opposing something, you can't then be benefiting from the success of it.
I don't see that as hypocritical either. You don't have to like a country or company to hold stock in it.
I mean, I know full well that this is just an ad hoc reason to say 'woman bad'. But all sorts of people who do not like the vaccine benefit from it all the same. For example, if more people have immunity due to the vaccine, this means Covid causes less damage, which leads to a reopening which in turn benefits everyone, including people who may not like it. Furthermore, is she even opposed to the vaccine, let alone having dedicated her career to it?
Is it just me that avoids investments purely for political reasons? Having integrity is hard, I suppose. Saying that, I decided to begrudgingly add AMD to my portfolio at the last dip to 130. Probably could have got it far lower, but I have faith that it will perform...mainly because Intel is a circus that thinks they can get away with not paying people if they don't get the jab.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/rep-marjorie-taylor-greene-says-shes-not-vaccinated-rips-vaccine-nazis/ar-AAQf2fi?ocid=BingNewsSearch
Yes, she definitely has. The last few months have been just her pretending to be helping the anti-vax movement while actively making it look stupid.
You can't avoid passively benefiting from the removal of restrictions, but you can avoid putting your money into Pfizer stock, as I did. I lost a huge amount of potential gains selling at ~$42, but I have a clear conscience.