Is it just me that avoids investments purely for political reasons?
Unlikely, but you may have the misprision that buying a company's stock benefits the company. It really doesn't. The question is whether you will reap the benefits, or... women.
Saying that, I decided to begrudgingly add AMD to my portfolio at the last dip to 130
130 is a dip now? I bought AMD a while back at $2.
mainly because Intel is a circus that thinks they can get away with not paying people if they don't get the jab.
Look, making investment decisions based on ideology is quite a bad idea. You'll end up losing money. But at least you are not shorting Intel.
Yes, she definitely has. The last few months have been just her pretending to be helping the anti-vax movement while actively making it look stupid.
The anti-vax movement really doesn't need any help looking stupid. Also, your article only says that she is not vaccinated, which she has every right to not be, and that she denounces those who are forcing vaccinations down people's throat, which she is also right about. This does not make her "anti-vax".
At least be honest and say that you don't like her because she is a woman.
You can't avoid passively benefiting from the removal of restrictions, but you can avoid putting your money into Pfizer stock, as I did. I lost a huge amount of potential gains selling at ~$42, but I have a clear conscience.
Technically it does. Issuing more shares allows an injection of funds, as most of the airlines did to get over their huge 2020 losses. However, it's obvious that if you don't buy it, someone else will. That's how the market works. I'm just personally more comfortable not profiting off people's misery. Same reason I don't own Raytheon.
Yes, $130 is a dip now. It's a ~$150 stock with target prices in the mid 200s (which I don't believe.)
It's worked well for me so far. The only time it didn't work was shorting AstraZeneca, and I made that back shorting Goolag before a major Fed decision. Shorting ATVI is also going pretty well. I probably should have closed it a while ago, but I'm still up. I'm definitely not going to jump into leveraged shorts against every company I hate like I'm trying to wage war against them.
I've always considered her a grifter. She's profiting off vaccines being shoved down people's throats.
Because they didn't buy in the first place? It honestly occupied a lot of my mind while I had it, even though it was tiny compared to my major holdings at the time, which were Realty Income and Microsoft. I just felt dirty making money off people shifting poison.
Technically it does. Issuing more shares allows an injection of funds, as most of the airlines did to get over their huge 2020 losses.
Only if they issue more stock, right?
I'm just personally more comfortable not profiting off people's misery. Same reason I don't own Raytheon.
That is one thing. But to condemn others for having stock is quite another, especially if you cast doubt on their sincerity. I may own stock in woke companies as well, but that is not an approval of their nonsense.
Yes, $130 is a dip now. It's a ~$150 stock with target prices in the mid 200s (which I don't believe.)
I'd pay no attention to 'target prices' at all. If the people telling others to do that believed it, they'd sell everything they own and borrow as much as they can and only buy AMD options.
Shorting ATVI is also going pretty well.
Eh... things work out well for the turkey as well until Thanksgiving, but I know I can't persuade you.
Just keep in mind that there is a possibility that you are wrong, that not half the population is out to commit genocide, and that sadly woke companies will not necessarily face the costs of their irrationality as long as you can stay solvent.
I've always considered her a grifter. She's profiting off vaccines being shoved down people's throats.
Is 'grifter' a synonym for 'politician'?
Because they didn't buy in the first place? It honestly occupied a lot of my mind while I had it, even though it was tiny compared to my major holdings at the time, which were Realty Income and Microsoft. I just felt dirty making money off people shifting poison.
That is assuming, without solid evidence, that it is 'poison' - and also disregarding the good that the vaccines do to some groups. Suppose that it does good or neutral to 95% of people and harm to 5% of people, is that then poison?
Unlikely, but you may have the misprision that buying a company's stock benefits the company. It really doesn't. The question is whether you will reap the benefits, or... women.
130 is a dip now? I bought AMD a while back at $2.
Look, making investment decisions based on ideology is quite a bad idea. You'll end up losing money. But at least you are not shorting Intel.
The anti-vax movement really doesn't need any help looking stupid. Also, your article only says that she is not vaccinated, which she has every right to not be, and that she denounces those who are forcing vaccinations down people's throat, which she is also right about. This does not make her "anti-vax".
At least be honest and say that you don't like her because she is a woman.
As do people who did not sell.
Technically it does. Issuing more shares allows an injection of funds, as most of the airlines did to get over their huge 2020 losses. However, it's obvious that if you don't buy it, someone else will. That's how the market works. I'm just personally more comfortable not profiting off people's misery. Same reason I don't own Raytheon.
Yes, $130 is a dip now. It's a ~$150 stock with target prices in the mid 200s (which I don't believe.)
It's worked well for me so far. The only time it didn't work was shorting AstraZeneca, and I made that back shorting Goolag before a major Fed decision. Shorting ATVI is also going pretty well. I probably should have closed it a while ago, but I'm still up. I'm definitely not going to jump into leveraged shorts against every company I hate like I'm trying to wage war against them.
I've always considered her a grifter. She's profiting off vaccines being shoved down people's throats.
Because they didn't buy in the first place? It honestly occupied a lot of my mind while I had it, even though it was tiny compared to my major holdings at the time, which were Realty Income and Microsoft. I just felt dirty making money off people shifting poison.
Only if they issue more stock, right?
That is one thing. But to condemn others for having stock is quite another, especially if you cast doubt on their sincerity. I may own stock in woke companies as well, but that is not an approval of their nonsense.
I'd pay no attention to 'target prices' at all. If the people telling others to do that believed it, they'd sell everything they own and borrow as much as they can and only buy AMD options.
Eh... things work out well for the turkey as well until Thanksgiving, but I know I can't persuade you.
Just keep in mind that there is a possibility that you are wrong, that not half the population is out to commit genocide, and that sadly woke companies will not necessarily face the costs of their irrationality as long as you can stay solvent.
Is 'grifter' a synonym for 'politician'?
That is assuming, without solid evidence, that it is 'poison' - and also disregarding the good that the vaccines do to some groups. Suppose that it does good or neutral to 95% of people and harm to 5% of people, is that then poison?