Technically it does. Issuing more shares allows an injection of funds, as most of the airlines did to get over their huge 2020 losses.

Only if they issue more stock, right?

I'm just personally more comfortable not profiting off people's misery. Same reason I don't own Raytheon.

That is one thing. But to condemn others for having stock is quite another, especially if you cast doubt on their sincerity. I may own stock in woke companies as well, but that is not an approval of their nonsense.

Yes, $130 is a dip now. It's a ~$150 stock with target prices in the mid 200s (which I don't believe.)

I'd pay no attention to 'target prices' at all. If the people telling others to do that believed it, they'd sell everything they own and borrow as much as they can and only buy AMD options.

Shorting ATVI is also going pretty well.

Eh... things work out well for the turkey as well until Thanksgiving, but I know I can't persuade you.

Just keep in mind that there is a possibility that you are wrong, that not half the population is out to commit genocide, and that sadly woke companies will not necessarily face the costs of their irrationality as long as you can stay solvent.

I've always considered her a grifter. She's profiting off vaccines being shoved down people's throats.

Is 'grifter' a synonym for 'politician'?

Because they didn't buy in the first place? It honestly occupied a lot of my mind while I had it, even though it was tiny compared to my major holdings at the time, which were Realty Income and Microsoft. I just felt dirty making money off people shifting poison.

That is assuming, without solid evidence, that it is 'poison' - and also disregarding the good that the vaccines do to some groups. Suppose that it does good or neutral to 95% of people and harm to 5% of people, is that then poison?