Right at the beginning of the pandemic, there was caution issued on jumping to conclusions by the experts monitoring the virus for the EU. (...) Von Der Leyen ignored this and pushed lockdowns
She has no authority to push 'lockdowns' though. Unless you think that crazy theory of yours, but I do believe that was before your dreaded woman was in charge of the ECB.
The second time she ignored the EMA was when the AZ vaccine was believed to be the worst (how naive we were) and she backed continuing to administer it until the whole bloc banned it one after the other.
If you do not believe that AZ was the worst, then you believe she was correc.t
But what did the EMA advise? Does she even have the authority to stop a given vaccine?
The third time was fairly recently, the EMA was starting to raise concerns about myocarditis from the MRNA shot. She blocked any statement about it until July when they finally issued the report with the bullshit boilerplate "this happens but the vax is still safe".
From whom? The EMA?
It wouldn't surprise me if she ignores them for a 4th time and pushes her personal goal of mandating the vax on everyone despite the lack of fatalities from the Omicron variant.
What good would that do her? And like I said, this is not even remotely within her authority.
She recommended lockdowns then. I'm not actually sure how much power she has, because I've never seen them defy her to the point that she goes any further.
I think your mistake is in seeing causality there, as opposed to the ruling class being basically of one mind. It also helps that she is the kind of boogeyman that you want.
It still should have been halted until the investigation was completed. She refused to recommend this until her hand was forced.
The Johnson & Johnson pause in the US is widely viewed as a mistake that contributed to not-very-well founded fears.
She blocked any public statement about it for months and even had discussion of it censored for disinformation.
OK, so this is now sounding a bit less likely. Can you back this up?
She doesn't care, she wasn't elected. She's sitting in a stolen seat playing dictator and seeing how far she can push the sadistic plans.
If it's not within your authority, you will not be obyed.
Did I miss something?
She has no authority to push 'lockdowns' though. Unless you think that crazy theory of yours, but I do believe that was before your dreaded woman was in charge of the ECB.
If you do not believe that AZ was the worst, then you believe she was correc.t
But what did the EMA advise? Does she even have the authority to stop a given vaccine?
From whom? The EMA?
What good would that do her? And like I said, this is not even remotely within her authority.
I think your mistake is in seeing causality there, as opposed to the ruling class being basically of one mind. It also helps that she is the kind of boogeyman that you want.
The Johnson & Johnson pause in the US is widely viewed as a mistake that contributed to not-very-well founded fears.
OK, so this is now sounding a bit less likely. Can you back this up?
If it's not within your authority, you will not be obyed.