She recommended lockdowns then. I'm not actually sure how much power she has, because I've never seen them defy her to the point that she goes any further.

I think your mistake is in seeing causality there, as opposed to the ruling class being basically of one mind. It also helps that she is the kind of boogeyman that you want.

It still should have been halted until the investigation was completed. She refused to recommend this until her hand was forced.

The Johnson & Johnson pause in the US is widely viewed as a mistake that contributed to not-very-well founded fears.

She blocked any public statement about it for months and even had discussion of it censored for disinformation.

OK, so this is now sounding a bit less likely. Can you back this up?

She doesn't care, she wasn't elected. She's sitting in a stolen seat playing dictator and seeing how far she can push the sadistic plans.

If it's not within your authority, you will not be obyed.