As we now have trans as a protected class it has shown the slippery slope in full free fall from the “gay rights” debate a decade ago. The problem is that laws based on fallacies will always be abused because their is no need to prove that any additions are legitimate. We have known for centuries men and women are not equal, we have known for centuries that racial aggregates depended on the culture dictating genetics. When we pretended that this didn’t matter we opened the door for non-biological protected classes. There has never been any evidence that being gay or trans is genetic, and there has been inconclusive evidence that gay and trans is biological at all aside from the biological impact occurring from grooming. In fact the best biological evidence we have is that external stimuli (aka other people) is what causes biological changes in the individual. Yet now we have more protected classes that are inherently non-biological than provably biological. These abuses are meant to subjugate not protect, they are meant to deny reality in place of accepting it.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (138)
sorted by:
these threads always crack me up, both here and on other right-wing sites I frequent. a bunch of people who have clear disdain for modern science and scientists, trying to invoke The Science™ to support their preexisting gut feelings.
reminds me of this smuggie.
I love science; I have disdain for many of the people who do science, many of who are more interested in playing politics, gaining prestige and earning large government grants than actually pursuing the unvarnished truth.
But do you fucking love science?
It always cracks me up how retards claim something is natural then does nothing to prove it while massive amounts of evidence suggests otherwise. The closest argument we’ve seen to a biological impact is the pregnant moms hormones impacting the fetus, but this doesn’t explain why twins have different sexual preferences. You could always try reading about the actual studies before derping your thoughts around.
that's one huge strawman. when did I claim any of this? show me. you know absolutely nothing about my opinions.
I'm talking about the phenomenon of people who tell you they mistrust science and academia ...and then tell you to trust this screenshot of some anon on an imageboard with little or no sources or verification.