As we now have trans as a protected class it has shown the slippery slope in full free fall from the “gay rights” debate a decade ago. The problem is that laws based on fallacies will always be abused because their is no need to prove that any additions are legitimate. We have known for centuries men and women are not equal, we have known for centuries that racial aggregates depended on the culture dictating genetics. When we pretended that this didn’t matter we opened the door for non-biological protected classes. There has never been any evidence that being gay or trans is genetic, and there has been inconclusive evidence that gay and trans is biological at all aside from the biological impact occurring from grooming. In fact the best biological evidence we have is that external stimuli (aka other people) is what causes biological changes in the individual. Yet now we have more protected classes that are inherently non-biological than provably biological. These abuses are meant to subjugate not protect, they are meant to deny reality in place of accepting it.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (138)
sorted by:
Math. Turns out the number of viable mutations that would be required to jump species in primates exceeds the estimated age of the planet, let alone the supposed timeline we're given.
And that's if there was a viable mutation passed on every generation. Which there observably is not. Evolution was a handwave from the beginning.
I don't have the exact numbers on me at present, it was detailed in a fairly recent blog post on Vox Day's site. Check it out there, turns out nobody had ever bothered to run the numbers before.
Math is a huge problem for it for real. Like, beyond astronomical problem for it.
Oh people have totally ran the numbers before, for quite a while in fact has this been known, and there have been many books written about this. Just doesn't get brought up because it is "CONFIRMED SCIENCE."
It's the whole "Million Monkeys at Typewriters" problem. We don't have an infinite amount of time for the monkeys to get it right. Whatever they do type is also going to be illegible 99% of the time, even if they got close. Maybe if they had an editor/proofreader.... Oh, but that'd be intelligent design. That's clearly a stupid thought.