It hasn't gone to Reynolds yet but it's cleared the Assembly, 45-4 in Senate and 68-27 in the House.
Basically, Iowa's new law requires that any employer mandate for vaccinations must include a religious exemption.
But going one further, it gives it teeth by saying that employees fired over vaccine status receive unemployment benefits.
Why settle for forced infringement on your rights?
A start is a start.
The Assembly was in special session for redistricting. That they got another bill in AT ALL required that the bill be simple and uncontroversial to get enough votes on the first try, cuz they were only gonna get one swing at it. There wasn't going to be support to extend the session another day when the maps were the only reason they were in session at all.
The GOP is aware that it doesn't go far enough and will take another swing at it in January during the normal session.
Where does it legally say we have a RIGHT to employment? I'm against mandates, but I'm not retarded enough to go around screaming I have a right to employment without being able to point to the appropriate law to back up my claim.
Also, why "settle"? If you're starving do you reject a sandwich because it doesn't have Grey Poupon? Fuck you "all or nothing" psychos.
Right, because employers really want to be firing people over something as petty as a vaccine with a 99.9% survival rate, especially right now. They're being forced, too
The right to privacy, meaning the right to be left alone. The government inserting itself between the relationship of employer and the average American worker is infringing the rights of nearly every American indiscriminately.
Don't move the goalposts to argue against me you faggot. I asked to provide legal fucking proof of the RIGHT to EMPLOYMENT. I wasn't talking "privacy" you fucking retard. You and the rest of you downvoting retards need to go back to reddit with that stupid shit. What is this, the forum for Special Needs? You people are fucking ridiculous.
Wake the fuck up and quit being a child. There’s no such thing as privacy and there hasn’t been in your lifetime. Your ignorance to your exposure isn’t “privacy.”
Privacy in the legal sense, not privacy as in “online privacy”
Right to work is actually considered a fundamental human right alongside right to peacefully assemble.
So . . . it says that right here?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Declaration_of_Human_Rights
? I guess you are retarded.
Huurrrr durrr wikipedia!! Where's the legal fucking citation like I asked for, not your soy drinking navel gazing faggotry?
Go back to reddit you screeching faggot
Rights are a liberal myth. This is about rejecting the sacraments of the state enforced progressive religion. Employers don't have to be agents of Satan, but they choose to be so because the managerial class has more class solidarity than any other ruling class in history.
Oh look, a very rational response downvoted into oblivion. Color me shocked.
Because it's off-topic. We're not talking about a "right to employment", we're talking about a right to not participate in forced medical experiments without your livelihood being taken away.
Also he has an amazingly shitty attitude.
He’s 100% right. Nobody is holding you down and sticking a needle in your arm. And don’t start with the slippery slope fallacy. It’s a privilege to work for a company, not a right. They don’t have to hire you nor keep you employed. They pay you to be there and they have rules. Don’t like the rules? Don’t show up. Nobody is making you.
Thanks. Everyone wants to scream "muh rights" but are too stupid to actually look into what legal rights they actually have. Then they wonder when shit doesn't work out for them, and just attack the messenger instead. I wish these booger eaters would go back to reddit where they came from.
Imagine being so retarded you thanked a troll for agreeing with you. So dumb dumb, please do look up your legal rights, magically discrimination based on religious beliefs, and personal health are protected under the law. I know it’s hard for a wannabe Brian Stelter, but try making a rational argument just once, okay pookums?