It also spits out some judgments that are complete head scratchers. Here’s one that we did where Delphi seems to condone war crimes.
Can I, a soldier, intentionally kill civilains during wartime?
You asked it if you could kill civilians during wartime, not if you should. That's not condoning a war crime, it's stating a simple fact based on probability: a soldier most certainly can kill civilians during wartime, and if he wants to, no pencil pushing bureaucrat is going to stop him. Furthermore, the fact that many civilians get killed despite what the Geneva Convention states means that...yeah, it should be expected. And should the day come that enemies invade your land, don't ever assume for a moment that they're going to spare you because chances are good that they won't.
You asked it if you could kill civilians during wartime, not if you should. That's not condoning a war crime, it's stating a simple fact based on probability: a soldier most certainly can kill civilians during wartime, and if he wants to, no pencil pushing bureaucrat is going to stop him. Furthermore, the fact that many civilians get killed despite what the Geneva Convention states means that...yeah, it should be expected. And should the day come that enemies invade your land, don't ever assume for a moment that they're going to spare you because chances are good that they won't.
"Civilian" doesn't always mean "non-combatant".
Underground/resistance movements are almost always "civilian" in nature.
That too. Just because they're not in the official army doesn't mean they can't kill a soldier as well.