Lol, I always love the crime is because of poverty retards. Tell me why is it professional sports athletes and celebrities commit crimes at a higher rate than middle class Americans if poverty is the issue?
In NYC, asians have a poverty rate similar, if not greater, to blacks and hispanics. Their population is approximately half of either group (13% vs. 26%). Why do blacks make make up 63% of murder/homicide suspects (26% of pop), hispanics 27% (26% of pop), asians 3% (13% of pop), and whites 6% (33% of pop). Without controlling for poverty rate, whites are the least likely to commit murder; controlling for it, that becomes asians. But with asians jockeying with hispanics for highest poverty rate, why are they massively underrepresented in murder stats?
No idea what it looked like before it got changed since i was the first to archive it.
Archive.org’s robot caught it; archive.md link of that because the former is leftist converged.
Notable difference:
It is a neighborhood of some million-dollar houses, even million-dollar condos, yet in the past two weeks, two homicides on the same block and at least two carjackings.
Everyone always says non-violence is the best solution. Which is always possible, but if you snuff out the lineage of some politicians, well history shows the results.
Crime creates poverty and repels wealth. Wealthy neighbourhoods should have less crime, if they had sufficiently low crime rates to become wealthy in the first place.
Lol, I always love the crime is because of poverty retards. Tell me why is it professional sports athletes and celebrities commit crimes at a higher rate than middle class Americans if poverty is the issue?
And look at the past where you had dirt poor intact families with low crime
Better not look up those racist crime statistics of black neighborhoods pre-great migration.
You mean the ones in the north before southern blacks arrived?
Shhhh, there was no thriving black middle class. Black Americans have always lived in poverty due to racism.
Lol. Stop spouting white supremacist talking points
It goes way beyond just athletes and celebrities.
In NYC, asians have a poverty rate similar, if not greater, to blacks and hispanics. Their population is approximately half of either group (13% vs. 26%). Why do blacks make make up 63% of murder/homicide suspects (26% of pop), hispanics 27% (26% of pop), asians 3% (13% of pop), and whites 6% (33% of pop). Without controlling for poverty rate, whites are the least likely to commit murder; controlling for it, that becomes asians. But with asians jockeying with hispanics for highest poverty rate, why are they massively underrepresented in murder stats?
https://i.imgur.com/WfMAYD1.jpg
Yeah, how dare people expect safety where they live! Don't you know poor criminals are the best of America?
As for the article, archived link here. No idea what it looked like before it got changed since i was the first to archive it.
Archive.org’s robot caught it; archive.md link of that because the former is leftist converged.
Notable difference:
The only way anything will be done about crime is if the elite classes start tot suffer from them.
No matter how many poor minority kids are killed, they won't give a damn.
Everyone always says non-violence is the best solution. Which is always possible, but if you snuff out the lineage of some politicians, well history shows the results.
Crime creates poverty and repels wealth. Wealthy neighbourhoods should have less crime, if they had sufficiently low crime rates to become wealthy in the first place.
This. Wokies can almost see the correlation but making that judgement is a bridge too far because of the unfortunate implications.
Are these same people not always screaming that poverty is the 'cause' of crime, and that we should not condemn crime as strongly?
But even though poverty causes crime, wealthier neighborhoods do not have less crime?