He's allowed to spend billions manipulating governments across the globe, but to even mention his name is an anti-semitic act.
Do people really still wonder where anti-semitism comes from? Because if so, I'll help you out: powerful Jewish assholes literally make you choose between obeying their every order or being anti-semitic.
He was the one who sent out that memo on January 12th 1931. After WWII he also supported Zionism and gave recognition of Israel three days after it's declaration of independence. Both his son and daughter married Jews.
The modern founders of Israel were very socialist. (See also the kibbutzes.) Stalin wanted to pull it into its sphere of influence, but this failed. Turns out most Jews do like money even if the Zionist leaders were socialist, and so Israel sided with the US instead.
The Soviets took this personally and from then on they'd support every Muslim terror group they could find. This is why the modern left is still such a fan of Muslims. Not that the Muslims have ever seen it as anything but an alliance of convenience. They're doing their own thing no matter what.
He was the one who sent out that memo on January 12th 1931.
Duh. You're echoing his propaganda, without any critical thinking whatsoever. Though it's cute that you think there was any such thing as 'law' in Stalin's USSR.
After WWII he also supported Zionism and gave recognition of Israel three days after it's declaration of independence.
Correct, and he also told CZ to send Israel arms... in order to cause trouble for the British. Now do the Doctor's Plot and what he did to the wives of his closest aides, like Molotov, who were Jewish.
You completely ignored the dichotomy I outlined, a dichotomy that exists and cannot be ignored, in order to score a pithy little comeback with no substance. Do you imagine this makes you look clever?
Originally? You are correct.
Now "anti-semitism" is just saying that there are a lot of jews in positions of power.
My opinion is that the fact they are jews is meaningless, a lot of the so called jews do not give 2 shits about Israel or jews in general, they use anti-semitism as a weapon and that is it.
They absolutely use anti-Semitism as a weapon. How many other Jews call this out? Would "virtually none" be a safe guess? That's tribalism in action. If no one else can safely criticize any element of your group, and you refuse to police your own, what exactly do you expect other groups to do? Bend over? Sacrifice their livelihoods as the price for critiquing the Jewish elites because you gleefully join in on the baseless accusations of anti-semitism? People like George Soros are the greatest enemies to the Jewish people, and the Jewish people need to help us stop them.
Same as Poland, Czech Republic (less so), Ukraine and essentially much of the former Eastern bloc (arguably minus Slovakia and Lithuania. I’m sure there are other exceptions, too…).
I would hazard a guess there’s reasons for that.
Slovenia is tiny, though. Tiny tiny. So I guess they’re just so… Obscure, outside of cycling, that they’re PM can get away with being based, unlike, say, Orban or arguably someone like Kurtz or Le Pen…
Demonstrably false. You may criticize white people at any time. Because the establishment is anti-white.
I think the "establishment" moniker is dubious at best and actively obscurantist at worst. And I say this as someone who does not believe "the joos" are responsible for everything bad in the world, so don't mistake my motivation. I just think "the establishment" is only useful as historical contextualization. When it comes to actually opposing the establishment, you have to name names. Otherwise, what are your tactics? Blindly oppose all power? But you need power to defeat power.
I mean, Soros isn’t really even what we would generally call “establishment”, at least prior to what, the last decade or so…
Unlike, say, Jacob Rothschild, or the Royal Family, or David Cameron, or George W Bush, or Hillary Clinton…
He’s more… A “shadowy” behind the scenes figure with a fuck tonne of money who apparently reshapes things behind the scenes. “New money” vis a vis old money.
Although now that the “new money” woke corporate donor class effectively IS the establishment, eh… I dunno exactly where he fits.
Personally, though, I blame the system that allows this undue influence to occur/be pedalled, rather than one (old) Hungarian Jewish weirdo with more money than sense, and far too many pet causes… But I guess that’s just me.
He's allowed to spend billions manipulating governments across the globe, but to even mention his name is an anti-semitic act.
Do people really still wonder where anti-semitism comes from? Because if so, I'll help you out: powerful Jewish assholes literally make you choose between obeying their every order or being anti-semitic.
The USSR was the first country to introduce anti-semitism laws and it gave offenders the death penalty.
Did Stalin, a notorious and inveterate anti-Semite, get the death penalty? Must have missed that episode.
He was the one who sent out that memo on January 12th 1931. After WWII he also supported Zionism and gave recognition of Israel three days after it's declaration of independence. Both his son and daughter married Jews.
The modern founders of Israel were very socialist. (See also the kibbutzes.) Stalin wanted to pull it into its sphere of influence, but this failed. Turns out most Jews do like money even if the Zionist leaders were socialist, and so Israel sided with the US instead.
The Soviets took this personally and from then on they'd support every Muslim terror group they could find. This is why the modern left is still such a fan of Muslims. Not that the Muslims have ever seen it as anything but an alliance of convenience. They're doing their own thing no matter what.
With Britain and with France.
When Israel, Britain, and France invaded Egypt (the Suez Crisis), it was America who forced them to get out.
Islamic Socialists were extremely powerful prior to the rise of Islamism, and Islamic Communists (like in Iran) were also strong.
Duh. You're echoing his propaganda, without any critical thinking whatsoever. Though it's cute that you think there was any such thing as 'law' in Stalin's USSR.
Correct, and he also told CZ to send Israel arms... in order to cause trouble for the British. Now do the Doctor's Plot and what he did to the wives of his closest aides, like Molotov, who were Jewish.
I'm not sure that proves Stalin was a strong antisemite. He was just a bad dude.
Envy and stupidity.
You completely ignored the dichotomy I outlined, a dichotomy that exists and cannot be ignored, in order to score a pithy little comeback with no substance. Do you imagine this makes you look clever?
Originally? You are correct. Now "anti-semitism" is just saying that there are a lot of jews in positions of power. My opinion is that the fact they are jews is meaningless, a lot of the so called jews do not give 2 shits about Israel or jews in general, they use anti-semitism as a weapon and that is it.
They absolutely use anti-Semitism as a weapon. How many other Jews call this out? Would "virtually none" be a safe guess? That's tribalism in action. If no one else can safely criticize any element of your group, and you refuse to police your own, what exactly do you expect other groups to do? Bend over? Sacrifice their livelihoods as the price for critiquing the Jewish elites because you gleefully join in on the baseless accusations of anti-semitism? People like George Soros are the greatest enemies to the Jewish people, and the Jewish people need to help us stop them.
VERY many leftist (anti-Israel, because muh Muslims) Jews have the mantra "anti-Zionism is not anti-Semitism".
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Could you be a bit more specific?
Slovenia is Based, thank God.
Same as Poland, Czech Republic (less so), Ukraine and essentially much of the former Eastern bloc (arguably minus Slovakia and Lithuania. I’m sure there are other exceptions, too…).
I would hazard a guess there’s reasons for that.
Slovenia is tiny, though. Tiny tiny. So I guess they’re just so… Obscure, outside of cycling, that they’re PM can get away with being based, unlike, say, Orban or arguably someone like Kurtz or Le Pen…
Why Slovakia? It's hardly ever in the news except they do things like building tall walls around Gypsy dwellings (and it's "racist").
Xi Jinping was right.
You may only criticize Jews who are anti-establishment.
Same with every other group.
Demonstrably false. You may criticize white people at any time. Because the establishment is anti-white.
I think the "establishment" moniker is dubious at best and actively obscurantist at worst. And I say this as someone who does not believe "the joos" are responsible for everything bad in the world, so don't mistake my motivation. I just think "the establishment" is only useful as historical contextualization. When it comes to actually opposing the establishment, you have to name names. Otherwise, what are your tactics? Blindly oppose all power? But you need power to defeat power.
Not (leftist) journalists, not priests of Sciencelogy (which is settled), not trannies, and not other protected groups.
I mean, Soros isn’t really even what we would generally call “establishment”, at least prior to what, the last decade or so…
Unlike, say, Jacob Rothschild, or the Royal Family, or David Cameron, or George W Bush, or Hillary Clinton…
He’s more… A “shadowy” behind the scenes figure with a fuck tonne of money who apparently reshapes things behind the scenes. “New money” vis a vis old money.
Although now that the “new money” woke corporate donor class effectively IS the establishment, eh… I dunno exactly where he fits.
Personally, though, I blame the system that allows this undue influence to occur/be pedalled, rather than one (old) Hungarian Jewish weirdo with more money than sense, and far too many pet causes… But I guess that’s just me.