Demonstrably false. You may criticize white people at any time. Because the establishment is anti-white.
I think the "establishment" moniker is dubious at best and actively obscurantist at worst. And I say this as someone who does not believe "the joos" are responsible for everything bad in the world, so don't mistake my motivation. I just think "the establishment" is only useful as historical contextualization. When it comes to actually opposing the establishment, you have to name names. Otherwise, what are your tactics? Blindly oppose all power? But you need power to defeat power.
I mean, Soros isn’t really even what we would generally call “establishment”, at least prior to what, the last decade or so…
Unlike, say, Jacob Rothschild, or the Royal Family, or David Cameron, or George W Bush, or Hillary Clinton…
He’s more… A “shadowy” behind the scenes figure with a fuck tonne of money who apparently reshapes things behind the scenes. “New money” vis a vis old money.
Although now that the “new money” woke corporate donor class effectively IS the establishment, eh… I dunno exactly where he fits.
Personally, though, I blame the system that allows this undue influence to occur/be pedalled, rather than one (old) Hungarian Jewish weirdo with more money than sense, and far too many pet causes… But I guess that’s just me.
You may only criticize Jews who are anti-establishment.
Same with every other group.
Demonstrably false. You may criticize white people at any time. Because the establishment is anti-white.
I think the "establishment" moniker is dubious at best and actively obscurantist at worst. And I say this as someone who does not believe "the joos" are responsible for everything bad in the world, so don't mistake my motivation. I just think "the establishment" is only useful as historical contextualization. When it comes to actually opposing the establishment, you have to name names. Otherwise, what are your tactics? Blindly oppose all power? But you need power to defeat power.
Not (leftist) journalists, not priests of Sciencelogy (which is settled), not trannies, and not other protected groups.
I mean, Soros isn’t really even what we would generally call “establishment”, at least prior to what, the last decade or so…
Unlike, say, Jacob Rothschild, or the Royal Family, or David Cameron, or George W Bush, or Hillary Clinton…
He’s more… A “shadowy” behind the scenes figure with a fuck tonne of money who apparently reshapes things behind the scenes. “New money” vis a vis old money.
Although now that the “new money” woke corporate donor class effectively IS the establishment, eh… I dunno exactly where he fits.
Personally, though, I blame the system that allows this undue influence to occur/be pedalled, rather than one (old) Hungarian Jewish weirdo with more money than sense, and far too many pet causes… But I guess that’s just me.