These cunts deem anyone they print about public figures. Remember Sandmann? Their legal defense said because the news made him public he was a public figure.
That's not how public figure works in defamation cases. If the press printing about you and an incident is what made someone "famous/infamous" doesn't count when it comes to slander/liable. You had to be well known BEFORE a story is posted to count as a public figure.
One could call this the "Taylor Lorenz Syndrome." So many journalists go around casually ruining the lives and reputations of even private, powerless, obscure people, then instantly claim they're the real victim when people object to that and critique their work ("harassment!").
These cunts deem anyone they print about public figures. Remember Sandmann? Their legal defense said because the news made him public he was a public figure.
That's not how public figure works in defamation cases. If the press printing about you and an incident is what made someone "famous/infamous" doesn't count when it comes to slander/liable. You had to be well known BEFORE a story is posted to count as a public figure.
In a sane world, yes. As we have seen with numerous judges, sanity and legality are not present.
also, the one who establishes if you are a famous or semi-famous person is the court and nobody else.
He was clearly smirking with malicious intent.
BuT hE HaS a PuNcHaBlE fAcE
It was the smirk that defined the start of e-WWIII, and the persecution of the digital shitlibs.
It’s estimated he walked with around $50k.
I don’t know if that’s before or after Lin Wood got his yuge slice.
https://twitter.com/ggreenwald/status/1448369629932527617
ROFFLEZ
I'll just call myself a journalist so I'm on the same level.
Problems/solution: Continue using facebook
Facebook is a echo chamber. If you are on FB thinking you are fighting the good fight, YOU are the problem.
We lose
Just delete that platform !
well, duh! only PEOPLE can be public figures!
when your blue checkmark just level up