- White.
- Female.
- Grew up in the midwest/ lily-white neighborhoods.
Are they simply exploiting the academic grift?
Or Is there a female evolutionary desire to create racial tension and watch the men fight?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (36)
sorted by:
21st century Western white people are, as far as I know, the only racial demographic in history with an out-group bias. This behavior is dysgenic; it is exceedingly unlikely for any population to develop this trait organically. In this case, our suicidal out-group bias is likely a result of 60ish years of anti-white propaganda disseminated by academia, news media, and entertainment. Draw your own conclusions about the demographic makeup of the leaders of those industries.
Women are more social by necessity and more collectivist by nature. On the scale of a family or a home, or possibly a small community, these traits are beneficial. On the scale of a city, a state, a nation, or a planet, these traits are incredibly destructive. When you combine the collectivist leanings of women with the out-group bias of indoctrinated whites, you're looking at a recipe for total disaster.
This one is more of an environmental constraint. One of the privileges afforded by wealth and comfort is the allowance of certain delusional beliefs - such as progressive ideologies - which are in no way compatible with our Darwinian reality. Often times, the only remedy for such ignorance is a sudden and violent collision with reality. This is the origin of the phrase "a liberal is a conservative who hasn't been mugged yet".
In some ways, whites are victims of their own success. They create prosperous and peaceful communities and societies, which in turn create sheltered and gullible people who are ripe for exploitation.
The bulwarks against such weakness are the traditional values of faith, family, and nation. It's no surprise that these are precisely the values under attack by the left.
Yes, they are called luxury beliefs.
There also exists the phrase "familiarity breeds contempt" for a reason.
This explains why matriarchies largely dissapear in history once large cities start appearing.
Well, contrarily what we're seeing in the west is matriarchy run amok (empathy, emotion, less logical, nanny state taxation and welfare), but using patriarchal government (protector and provider) to implement its will.
All stages of feminism have been cancerous. Women voting and entering the workforce have been death knells to western civilization. Look at the voting stats by gender. Women can be easily manipulated by the cabal/globalists with appeals to emotion, appeals to authority, and appeals to popularity, all of which are logically fallacious arguments that men for large part don't succumb to. "Smash the patriarchy" isn't said by accident. Turning all men in popular media into bumbling idiots or evil isn't an accident. Turning all women in popular media into super intelligent, Mary Sue, do-no-wrongs isn't an accident. They're brainwashing people to think, say, and do only what they want.
All stable society is naturally patriarchal. Men evolved to prioritize truth and logic above all else, because it better enabled us to survive and fulfill our role as protector and provider. Women evolved to prioritize people and empathy over all else, because it better enabled them to survive and fulfill their role as mother and caretaker. However, truth most hold top priority over people (the philosophical and real world ramifications for prioritizing people over truth should be obvious), and thus men must hold dominance over women, only due to our gender roles and what we prioritize. It has nothing to do with subjugating women, as the left portrays. Western civilization is failing because we've become matriarchal, prioritizing people over truth, because it enables the cabal to manipulate people easier, weakening us, so they can gain more power over us.
And why most of the ones that existed had the people living in glorified mud huts.
From what I saw for those same studies, its even narrower than that. Its Western white LEFTIST, because apparently moderates and conservatives still have an in-group bias. Not to the same degree as other races, but its still there.
The white people who are most exposed to media and academia are also the ones who exhibit out-group bias. Sorta lends credence to the indoctrination theory, eh?