The new unspeakable N-word, apparently (the game's written by Sam Maggs too)
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (82)
sorted by:
You're equating things that cannot be equated.
My argument against prostitution comes from a completely different line of reasoning unrelated to the workplace.
Prostitution damages the soul of both parties involved. It eats away at the moral and ethical foundations and principles that individuals hold and opens the door for satan's children to infest a new host.
I have no problem with nepotism, nor do I work networking. I think it is a just and righteous thing to provide work and opportunity to kin and tribe. The issues come when this idea is abused and someone that is obviously not competent is put into a position they aren't ready for, or when the system itself is coopted to only allow certain groups to use tribal preferences.
I ignored it because it's already answered.
That is prostitution, prostitution is wrong, and all parties involved should face punitive consequences.
In general I don't think women should be in a normal workplace until after they've started and raised a family, so to me that's not even an issue.
Now you are changing terms on it. You shouldn't do that willy nilly because you think things are interchangeable, as there is a difference.
Now that we have changed goal posts to prostitution, you've brought in a dozen more moral and ethical arguments and used THEM to make your point for you.
So you have no problem with nepotism, you just have problems with nepotism. You know you don't have to defend this point.
Until there is a sexual angle, then its immoral and evil. You take one peek at some cleavage and suddenly the just righteousness is instantly evil! And certainly there is zero moral qualms to be raised about the just and fairness of a society built on "whose blood are you." Never in history has that been the dominating factor in how its used over anything close to competency!
Of course, after you move the goal post and provide additional context on your thoughts on women's place suddenly a lot more questions end up answered. Your timeline of events needs some work though.
Bro.
No.
Stop.
I don't need your wall of text arguing linguistics.
Fuck right off with that.
I wrote my point, my point is clear, do not jumble it into nonsense that I did not say.
Apparently we do because you just keep changing what words mean to suit your point whenever you want.
I legitimately cannot understand your point because I'm trying to give you the benefit of the doubt on what you mean and all I can get is "its bad when I say its bad, and good when I say its good."
That's why you have to be specific when you try and say "favors for business advancement" is both "just and righteous" this time, but this other time it should be illegal and immoral this other. Its linguistic because you are tripping over yourself in contradictions, and that's the first step to making a lick of sense of your run around point.
I've been consistent and my point was clear. You cannot understand or comprehend that I consider the issue of prostitution from a different moral and ethical foundation.
Sexual favors for profit and networking are not even close to being similar.