It's pretty obvious that jester obsessively reports every post that even hints at the JQ. When he's not degrading the forum by spamming his garbage content, anyways.
You've also confirmed that there's only one identity group that is truly protected on this board. The inclusion of the word "conspiracy" under R16 is a dead giveaway that it is a targeted rule.
Meanwhile, impossible1 shits on women endlessly, it's open season on trannies, the rainbow coalition is mocked at every opportunity, and black and Muslim crime stats are part and parcel.
Just don't say a cross word about you know who. And the fact that you can't definitely doesn't prove your point.
No one ever really says that trannies are an actual identity group, or that they are innately morally inferior. Just that they are mentally ill, or something of the like, which is true.
the rainbow coalition is mocked at every opportunity,
Normally it's just TentElephent proving that Queer Activism is filled to the brim with pedophiles
BASED community, plus there's a block option if certain people get annoying. As much as I find certain members 1 trick ponies and broken records, they have gems every so often so my block list is like 3 people and 2 were lefty cuck trolls.
SIXTEEN: Do not attack entire identity groups as inferior, subhuman, inherently morally deficient, biologically/evolutionary mongrel, or participating in a vast conspiracy to take over the world, ala ZOG-NWO / The Patriarchy.
It seems pretty clear to me.
It's pretty damn obvious people are reporting in bad faith and you let them get away with it.
Do you really want me to start dolling out punishments based on my interpretation of whether reports are in bad faith or not?
If I did that, I'd have to take action against your reports already, and that's dumb.
Do you really want me to start dolling out punishments based on my interpretation of whether reports are in bad faith or not?
The opposite.
I think most reports are bullshit in general. There's very little that deserves being removed.
My further answer to that is in the other post.
If I did that, I'd have to take action against your reports already, and that's dumb.
You know exactly why I made those reports.
It is a bad joke that I was banned for that conversation, and the other guy was untouched. Multiple of his posts went over the line into anti-white attacks by the standards applied to my posts.
I don't think EITHER should be removed but the hypocrisy of it is astounding. You're using different standards between anti-white posts and anti-nonwhite posts.
I don't want you banning ANY of it except for the most low-effort, obvious bait posts.
I'm pretty certain as well that that's the majority opinion, and has been going all the way back to the creation of KiA2. Even the OG KiA people wanted full freedom of speech, with the stipulation that much was either off topic or bad faith actors.
The idea that anything negative about classes or groups is banned, except when it attacks whites, is ridiculous. The idea that high level threads are made every day directly linking to anti-white, anti-male, anti-Christian activism, meanwhile ordinary posters have to walk on egg shells on topics about race, gender, tribe, etc, is silly.
There's no sitewide requirement for these kinds of removals as there was on reddit.
Because I don't, since I'm using it as an example of how retarded your opinions are about the Jews by inverting it and using the Irish as an analogy to your stupidity?
EDIT: Since I am dealing with a retard here, then further explanation is required: As in, if you believe in the Jewish "conspiracy" then you must, by association and logic ALSO believe in the Irish "Conspiracy". If one exists, the other does too. Do you understand it now? Because one has as much evidence of its existence as the other, and both conspiracies are EXCEPTIONALLY retarded.
Wow... "antiwhite" when I claimed both ideas being utterly retarded. This is... wow. So much lack of self-awereness by these people thst it just leaves me speechless!
You avoid the JQ or directly implicating race.
For whatever reason our mods decided that it's fine to shit on women, just not specifically jewish or black women.
The very moment you make a post calling out race you'll face a temp ban.
Because literally 99.99999999% of the internet considers it commendable to shit on men.
I don't believe attacking a patsy does anything other than help the real villains, so I won't be making a race bait post anytime soon.
There's more than one villain in this play.
It's pretty obvious that jester obsessively reports every post that even hints at the JQ. When he's not degrading the forum by spamming his garbage content, anyways.
You've also confirmed that there's only one identity group that is truly protected on this board. The inclusion of the word "conspiracy" under R16 is a dead giveaway that it is a targeted rule.
Meanwhile, impossible1 shits on women endlessly, it's open season on trannies, the rainbow coalition is mocked at every opportunity, and black and Muslim crime stats are part and parcel.
Just don't say a cross word about you know who. And the fact that you can't definitely doesn't prove your point.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity attacks
Comment Approved: This doesn't do that.
He normally avoids it and sticks to feminism.
No one ever really says that trannies are an actual identity group, or that they are innately morally inferior. Just that they are mentally ill, or something of the like, which is true.
Normally it's just TentElephent proving that Queer Activism is filled to the brim with pedophiles
Why would that even be an issue?
THAT'S the one person I did block. Annoying little faggot cunt.
Thanks for thinking about me. No, I will not sleep with you. I'm superstraight, unlike some stormcucks here.
BASED community, plus there's a block option if certain people get annoying. As much as I find certain members 1 trick ponies and broken records, they have gems every so often so my block list is like 3 people and 2 were lefty cuck trolls.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity attacks
Comment Approved: It doesn't do that
That being said, I've repeatedly banned Impossible1, normally he gets his points back into compliance.
In compliance with what?
The rules are vague as all hell and allow or disallow pretty much anything.
It's pretty damn obvious people are reporting in bad faith and you let them get away with it.
It seems pretty clear to me.
Do you really want me to start dolling out punishments based on my interpretation of whether reports are in bad faith or not?
If I did that, I'd have to take action against your reports already, and that's dumb.
We went over that half a year ago.
It is anything but clear.
The opposite.
I think most reports are bullshit in general. There's very little that deserves being removed.
My further answer to that is in the other post.
You know exactly why I made those reports.
It is a bad joke that I was banned for that conversation, and the other guy was untouched. Multiple of his posts went over the line into anti-white attacks by the standards applied to my posts.
I don't think EITHER should be removed but the hypocrisy of it is astounding. You're using different standards between anti-white posts and anti-nonwhite posts.
JQ? That's a retarded conspiracy theory. As real as the Irish question.
Why do you hate the Irish so much, and why have the mods not banned you for your anti-white posts yet?
u/DomitiusOfMassilia
Answered: https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/13zMnPDjhD/x/c/4JEXsge02zZ
I don't want you banning ANY of it except for the most low-effort, obvious bait posts.
I'm pretty certain as well that that's the majority opinion, and has been going all the way back to the creation of KiA2. Even the OG KiA people wanted full freedom of speech, with the stipulation that much was either off topic or bad faith actors.
The idea that anything negative about classes or groups is banned, except when it attacks whites, is ridiculous. The idea that high level threads are made every day directly linking to anti-white, anti-male, anti-Christian activism, meanwhile ordinary posters have to walk on egg shells on topics about race, gender, tribe, etc, is silly.
There's no sitewide requirement for these kinds of removals as there was on reddit.
Because I don't, since I'm using it as an example of how retarded your opinions are about the Jews by inverting it and using the Irish as an analogy to your stupidity?
EDIT: Since I am dealing with a retard here, then further explanation is required: As in, if you believe in the Jewish "conspiracy" then you must, by association and logic ALSO believe in the Irish "Conspiracy". If one exists, the other does too. Do you understand it now? Because one has as much evidence of its existence as the other, and both conspiracies are EXCEPTIONALLY retarded.
The Irish are a genuine menace. Do not believe their lies. https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/002/057/787/102.png
https://i.imgur.com/b45WPLq.jpg :)
Comment Reported for: Anti-white racism attack
Comment Approved: You don't want me to treat these the exact same, because it would mean far more aggressive removals on my part.
Wow... "antiwhite" when I claimed both ideas being utterly retarded. This is... wow. So much lack of self-awereness by these people thst it just leaves me speechless!