I don't want you banning ANY of it except for the most low-effort, obvious bait posts.
I'm pretty certain as well that that's the majority opinion, and has been going all the way back to the creation of KiA2. Even the OG KiA people wanted full freedom of speech, with the stipulation that much was either off topic or bad faith actors.
The idea that anything negative about classes or groups is banned, except when it attacks whites, is ridiculous. The idea that high level threads are made every day directly linking to anti-white, anti-male, anti-Christian activism, meanwhile ordinary posters have to walk on egg shells on topics about race, gender, tribe, etc, is silly.
There's no sitewide requirement for these kinds of removals as there was on reddit.
Even the OG KiA people wanted full freedom of speech, with the stipulation that much was either off topic or bad faith actors.
I don't think that's true considering what HandOfBane and AoV have told me directly. They both think I'm an idiot who's allowed Nazis to take over this platform. They'd enjoy a purge.
The idea that anything negative about classes or groups is banned, except when it attacks whites, is ridiculous.
That is a ridiculous exaggeration. I know because "anything negative" is what I have to do on Reddit. I know the difference between my behavior here and on Reddit and it's fucking wildly different. If you don't remember how severe it is, look back at my comment history there for anything with "attack on an identity group" or " Long Rules: 3.j.ii". It's night and day.
Even on Reddit I occasionally get the rare anti-white statement, and most of the time it's sarcastic (but I'm not allowed to tolerate sarcasm on Reddit). There is almost never any genuine anti-white rhetoric I've seen on here. There's been no anti-male comments on here. The few anti-Christian comments are mostly ideological divisions between the atheists and the Christians.
meanwhile ordinary posters have to walk on egg shells on topics about race, gender, tribe, etc, is silly.
I don't think that's true considering what HandOfBane and AoV have told me directly.
Which is hilariously ironic considering the reason KiA2 came about was because the userbase disagreed with what the powerusers/mods wanted.
I think they'd be quite surprised at the outcome if opinions were polled.
That is a ridiculous exaggeration. I know because "anything negative" is what I have to do on Reddit.
It's an exaggeration, but not a ridiculous one. From my own experience, the experience of others, and from the mod logs, there's still a weird heavy handedness in regards to negative content.
I can accept that it's a difference in opinion on acceptable speech. I just heavily disagree and think it's unnecessary.
Again, not a thing here.
You've just said though that Impossible1 had to stifle his speech to fit the rules. I know I have, and others have told me they have as well.
I also know I've had a few longer, well written, well reasoned posts removed in the past. One reinstated after I changed terminology, but that's still ridiculous.
Here, let me even give you an example:
If I were to write something along the veins of "Black Americans are genetically predisposed to criminality, and here's why;" I would have to dot every i and cross every t to not get the message purged. It would still probably be purged.
I think they'd be quite surprised at the outcome if opinions were polled.
Considering most of GG was Left Libertarian, I think you are way off on the influence of any right-wing anything back in 2014 KiA.
From my own experience, the experience of others, and from the mod logs, there's still a weird heavy handedness in regards to negative content.
I saw that part of your conversation, and their opinion was that it was an issue with what was being reported, not heavy handedness.
And eggshells... please. Even my bannings are lenient. Again, in any other case, you and a dozen others would have been yeeted permanently months ago.
If I were to write something along the veins of "Black Americans are genetically predisposed to criminality, and here's why;" I would have to dot every i and cross every t to not get the message purged. It would still probably be purged.
No, it would be removed because you are asserting that a race of people is inherently inferior. There's no crossed T's and dotted I's. It just wouldn't fly at all.
I have never seen anyone (even that troll I just saw) say that Men, Whites, or Christians are an inherently, biologically, inferior degenerate race of lesser humans on KIA. Never.
I can't help the fact that you and others are making such comments in one and only one direction. You can't stand here and tell me that I'm being heavy handed to the one side that exists, and soft handed to the other side that doesn't. You get more leeway here than anywhere else online at this point. If you didn't, you'd already be gone.
Answered: https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/13zMnPDjhD/x/c/4JEXsge02zZ
I don't want you banning ANY of it except for the most low-effort, obvious bait posts.
I'm pretty certain as well that that's the majority opinion, and has been going all the way back to the creation of KiA2. Even the OG KiA people wanted full freedom of speech, with the stipulation that much was either off topic or bad faith actors.
The idea that anything negative about classes or groups is banned, except when it attacks whites, is ridiculous. The idea that high level threads are made every day directly linking to anti-white, anti-male, anti-Christian activism, meanwhile ordinary posters have to walk on egg shells on topics about race, gender, tribe, etc, is silly.
There's no sitewide requirement for these kinds of removals as there was on reddit.
I don't think that's true considering what HandOfBane and AoV have told me directly. They both think I'm an idiot who's allowed Nazis to take over this platform. They'd enjoy a purge.
That is a ridiculous exaggeration. I know because "anything negative" is what I have to do on Reddit. I know the difference between my behavior here and on Reddit and it's fucking wildly different. If you don't remember how severe it is, look back at my comment history there for anything with "attack on an identity group" or " Long Rules: 3.j.ii". It's night and day.
Even on Reddit I occasionally get the rare anti-white statement, and most of the time it's sarcastic (but I'm not allowed to tolerate sarcasm on Reddit). There is almost never any genuine anti-white rhetoric I've seen on here. There's been no anti-male comments on here. The few anti-Christian comments are mostly ideological divisions between the atheists and the Christians.
Again, not a thing here. Not even close.
Which is hilariously ironic considering the reason KiA2 came about was because the userbase disagreed with what the powerusers/mods wanted.
I think they'd be quite surprised at the outcome if opinions were polled.
It's an exaggeration, but not a ridiculous one. From my own experience, the experience of others, and from the mod logs, there's still a weird heavy handedness in regards to negative content.
I can accept that it's a difference in opinion on acceptable speech. I just heavily disagree and think it's unnecessary.
You've just said though that Impossible1 had to stifle his speech to fit the rules. I know I have, and others have told me they have as well.
I also know I've had a few longer, well written, well reasoned posts removed in the past. One reinstated after I changed terminology, but that's still ridiculous.
Here, let me even give you an example:
If I were to write something along the veins of "Black Americans are genetically predisposed to criminality, and here's why;" I would have to dot every i and cross every t to not get the message purged. It would still probably be purged.
Considering most of GG was Left Libertarian, I think you are way off on the influence of any right-wing anything back in 2014 KiA.
I saw that part of your conversation, and their opinion was that it was an issue with what was being reported, not heavy handedness.
And eggshells... please. Even my bannings are lenient. Again, in any other case, you and a dozen others would have been yeeted permanently months ago.
No, it would be removed because you are asserting that a race of people is inherently inferior. There's no crossed T's and dotted I's. It just wouldn't fly at all.
I have never seen anyone (even that troll I just saw) say that Men, Whites, or Christians are an inherently, biologically, inferior degenerate race of lesser humans on KIA. Never.
I can't help the fact that you and others are making such comments in one and only one direction. You can't stand here and tell me that I'm being heavy handed to the one side that exists, and soft handed to the other side that doesn't. You get more leeway here than anywhere else online at this point. If you didn't, you'd already be gone.