The information is out there but both sides tend to ignore it. Pro-coof-vax don't want to talk about myocarditis at all and anti-coof-vax are concerned about the spike protein but are ignoring that the spike protein is also in real coof. This paper is interesting because I couldn't find much info on if the spike proteins in real covid could break off (yes according to the paper) and if detached spike protein is more dangerous than when it is attached (also yes according to the paper).
Pro-coof-vax don't want to talk about myocarditis at all and anti-coof-vax are concerned about the spike protein but are ignoring that the spike protein is also in real coof.
I don't think that's really true; I think the vax skeptics are more of the mind that the 'vaccines' are inherently dangerous because they do the same thing that the virus does: produce toxic spike proteins.
The information is out there but both sides tend to ignore it. Pro-coof-vax don't want to talk about myocarditis at all and anti-coof-vax are concerned about the spike protein but are ignoring that the spike protein is also in real coof. This paper is interesting because I couldn't find much info on if the spike proteins in real covid could break off (yes according to the paper) and if detached spike protein is more dangerous than when it is attached (also yes according to the paper).
I don't think that's really true; I think the vax skeptics are more of the mind that the 'vaccines' are inherently dangerous because they do the same thing that the virus does: produce toxic spike proteins.
I'm generalizing a lot but there is definitely a significant faction that think the vaccine is more dangerous than the coof.