I don't know that I agree with those numbers. You've counted the same character actor combos multiple times if they appear in more than one work, while I think they should only be counted once.
By my count, it should be:
157 blackwashing
33 Asian washing
19 Hispanic washing
20 Brown washing
42 gender bender (M to F)
3 gender bender (F to M)
18 alphabet washing
3 Islam washing
27 whitewashing
They need to be added, multiple times, because of their insistence of changing the race or gender of the character. They could ignore or then cast them differently on the previous movie. Or something else.
Plus, it becomes problematic adding multiple movie names to one character. The text will become convoluted and confusing.
Everything else is absolutely retarded. Not worth my time. Since I already have this saved, and it took me, literally, less than 20 seconds to get these notes... I will debunk your last claims. You are too dumb to even know how to wipe your butt.
who dominated multiple slave trades in the West.
In 1830 there were only four Jews among the 11,000 Southerners who owned fifty or more slaves.
Historical Facts vs. Antisemitic Fictions: The Truth About Jews, Blacks, Slavery, Racism and Civil Rights (prepared under the auspices of the Simon Wiesenthal Center by Dr. Harold Brackman and Professor Mary R. Lefkowitz; 1993)
The Jewish role in the American slave trade was minimal.
Professor Jacob R. Marcus of Hebrew Union College in The Colonial American Jew (Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1970), Vol. 2, pp. 702-703
According to historian and rabbi Bertram Korn, there were Jewish owners of plantations, but altogether they constituted only a tiny proportion of the industry.
Bertram W. Korn, "Jews and Negro Slavery in the Old South, 1789-1865", in The Jewish Experience in America, ed. Abraham J. Karp (Waltham, MA: American Jewish Historical Society, 1969), Vol. 3, p. 180 :
LOL at the "proof" you have being a few Jews contradicting older Jewish sources and historians.
"United States Jewry" 1776-1985 Volume 1 by JACOB Rader Marcus. A RABBI.
"In 1820 over 75 percent of all Jewish families in Charleston, Richmond and Savannah owned slaves...almost 40 percent of Jewish households in the United States owned one slave or more. There were no protests against slavery as such by Jews in the South..."
Christian abolitionists fought to free slaves. Not Jews, who scapegoated the Christians.
"Of the 10 to 15 million Africans who were transplanted to the New World, no more than 6 percent—around 400,000—went to the Northern Hemisphere. Almost all of them went to South America, but you don't see your teachers giving Brazil a hard time, do you?
Blacks were never close to a majority in America, so it's mathematically impossible for most whites to have owned black slaves. At the peak of black slavery in the South, only 6 percent of Southern whites owned slaves. If you include the white people in the North, it means that only 1.4 percent of white Americans owned black slaves at the HEIGHT of slavery."
Hmm so let's look at Brazil shall we?
Marc Lee Raphael, Hebrew name Mordecai. Professor Emeritus, Religious Studies William and Mary in "Jews and Judaism in the United States: A Documentary History.
"Jews also took an active part in the Dutch colonial slave trade; indeed, the bylaws of the Recife and Mauricia congregations (1648) included an imposta (Jewish tac) of five soldos for each Negro slave a Brazilian Jews purchased from the West Indies company. Slave auctions were postponed if they fell on a Jewish holiday. In Curacao in the seventeenth century, as well as in the British colonies of Barbados and Jamaica in the eighteenth century, Jewish merchants played a major role in the slave trade. In fact, in all the American colonies, whether French (Martinique), British, or Dutch, Jewish merchants frequently dominated."
"This was no less true on the North American mainland, where during the eighteenth century Jews participated in the "triangular trade" that brought slaves form Africa to the West Indies and there exchanged them for molasses, which in turn was taken to New England and converted into rum for sale in Africa. Isaac Da Costa of Charleston in the 1750's, David Franks of Philadelphia in the 1760;s and Aaron Lopez (he his his Jewish identity like many of the Dutch and Spanish Jews) of Newport in the late 1760's and early 1770's dominated Jewish slave trading on the American continent."
proudg0y 0 point 1 hour ago +1 / -1
LOL at the "proof" you have being a few Jews contradicting older Jewish sources and historians.
"United States Jewry" 1776-1985 Volume 1 by JACOB Rader Marcus. A RABBI. "In 1820 over 75 percent of all Jewish families in Charleston, Richmond and Savannah owned slaves...almost 40 percent of Jewish households in the United States owned one slave or more. There were no protests against slavery as such by Jews in the South..."
Debunked on the stuff I gave you.
"Of the 10 to 15 million Africans who were transplanted to the New World, no more than 6 percent—around 400,000—went to the Northern Hemisphere. Almost all of them went to South America, but you don't see your teachers giving Brazil a hard time, do you?
Blacks were never close to a majority in America, so it's mathematically impossible for most whites to have owned black slaves. At the peak of black slavery in the South, only 6 percent of Southern whites owned slaves. If you include the white people in the North, it means that only 1.4 percent of white Americans owned black slaves at the HEIGHT of slavery."
Hmm so let's look at Brazil shall we?
Moving goal posts, we were talking about North America, not brazil. Focus!
Also the point about Brazil if you had the capacity to read and understand was that out of the 10,000,000-15,000,000 slaves brought over from Africa to the western hemisphere, only 400,000 came to North America, anywhere from 4% to as low as 2.6% of them ended up in the United States, where at minimum 96% of the slaves went to South America into places like Brazil.
In that regard for how "evil" people make out America to be with slavery, Anywhere south of the border is 25x worse that the most vile depiction of US slavery.
But no one cares about those slaves because they don't make enough money to be counted in the publics conscience. It's why not one single celebrity gives a shit that you can buy an african slave in the middle east for $90. Because championing those people doesn't get them millions of dollars in donations from suckers who think that those people will fight for them.
I never said anything of what you are talking about. I simply debunked the claims that the majority of the slave owners and traders were Jewish as per the claim of the stormfag.
Your post is technically correct. The Jewish role in the British-US slave trade was minimal, also their role in plantation ownership was minimal.
We should understand the reasons for this in the broader context of the Atlantic Slave trade.
The slave trade to the Americas was dominated by three large slave trading companies, The Royal African Company (British), Geoctrooieerde Westindische Compagnie (Dutch) and Compagnie Française des Indes occidentales (French).
Of these companies, the French and the British banned Jews from participating in the slave trade.
However, the Dutch company had 10% Jewish ownership and shipped nearly 40% of all slaves ever shipped to the Americas through the Atlantic slave trade. Roughly, 5.3M individuals (Patrick Manning, The Atlantic Slave Trade: Effects on Economies, Societies and Peoples in Africa, the Americas, and Europe, Duke University Press, 1992)
The Great majority of these slaves were shipped to Brazil, and the Caribbean, where retail traders and resellers were overwhelmingly Jews. (David Lowenthal, "West Indian Societies", Oxford Press, 1972).
Jews dominated the market providing African slaves to plantation owners, and had little to no interest in actually owning plantations themselves (Arnold Wiznitzer, "Jews in Colonial Brazil", Columbia University Press, 1960).
Thank you for trying in moving the goal posts but you failed. Dont forget to read theblink I shared in than previous post. It saves my time in debunking your nonsense.
Jewish settlers were an essential part of the fabric of the slave trade, although the actual number of slaves they might have purchased and then sold as middlemen amounted to a minute fraction of the huge number of Africans brought to Brazil over the course of more than three centuries
You can try to trivialize it all you want, but even if we ignore the retail/resale aspect, and just go for proportional 10% ownership in the Dutch company, that amounts to more than half a million people trafficked for enslavement.
But by all means, ignore this level of brutality and suffering to rationalize your point of view.
And you care? You only care because only a tiny minority of Jews owned some slaves somewhere in the world(And a discussion only started because a moron thought to blame Jews of owning slaves in America on a thread about woke washing in hollywood), otherwise, you would rejoice on it. And despite that tiny minority owning slaves, it still was a tiny minority and the whole doesn't deserve the blame you are placing.
I don't know that I agree with those numbers. You've counted the same character actor combos multiple times if they appear in more than one work, while I think they should only be counted once.
By my count, it should be:
157 blackwashing 33 Asian washing 19 Hispanic washing 20 Brown washing 42 gender bender (M to F) 3 gender bender (F to M) 18 alphabet washing 3 Islam washing 27 whitewashing
They need to be added, multiple times, because of their insistence of changing the race or gender of the character. They could ignore or then cast them differently on the previous movie. Or something else.
Plus, it becomes problematic adding multiple movie names to one character. The text will become convoluted and confusing.
Post Reported: Self Promotion of his youtube channel
He actively participates in this forum, and is producing content. Yes, I want to share his work because he is a user that is producing something.
Thanks!
And it is not even the youtube channel, but substack website with a YUUUGGEEEEEE list of race swaps, gender benders, and alphabet washing.
Must be the result of somebody I triggered! haha
Feel free.
Everything else is absolutely retarded. Not worth my time. Since I already have this saved, and it took me, literally, less than 20 seconds to get these notes... I will debunk your last claims. You are too dumb to even know how to wipe your butt.
Historical Facts vs. Antisemitic Fictions: The Truth About Jews, Blacks, Slavery, Racism and Civil Rights (prepared under the auspices of the Simon Wiesenthal Center by Dr. Harold Brackman and Professor Mary R. Lefkowitz; 1993)
Professor Jacob R. Marcus of Hebrew Union College in The Colonial American Jew (Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1970), Vol. 2, pp. 702-703
Bertram W. Korn, "Jews and Negro Slavery in the Old South, 1789-1865", in The Jewish Experience in America, ed. Abraham J. Karp (Waltham, MA: American Jewish Historical Society, 1969), Vol. 3, p. 180 :
LOL at the "proof" you have being a few Jews contradicting older Jewish sources and historians.
"United States Jewry" 1776-1985 Volume 1 by JACOB Rader Marcus. A RABBI. "In 1820 over 75 percent of all Jewish families in Charleston, Richmond and Savannah owned slaves...almost 40 percent of Jewish households in the United States owned one slave or more. There were no protests against slavery as such by Jews in the South..."
Christian abolitionists fought to free slaves. Not Jews, who scapegoated the Christians.
https://www.vice.com/sv/article/ppzevg/hey-v12n5
"Of the 10 to 15 million Africans who were transplanted to the New World, no more than 6 percent—around 400,000—went to the Northern Hemisphere. Almost all of them went to South America, but you don't see your teachers giving Brazil a hard time, do you?
Blacks were never close to a majority in America, so it's mathematically impossible for most whites to have owned black slaves. At the peak of black slavery in the South, only 6 percent of Southern whites owned slaves. If you include the white people in the North, it means that only 1.4 percent of white Americans owned black slaves at the HEIGHT of slavery."
Hmm so let's look at Brazil shall we?
Marc Lee Raphael, Hebrew name Mordecai. Professor Emeritus, Religious Studies William and Mary in "Jews and Judaism in the United States: A Documentary History.
"Jews also took an active part in the Dutch colonial slave trade; indeed, the bylaws of the Recife and Mauricia congregations (1648) included an imposta (Jewish tac) of five soldos for each Negro slave a Brazilian Jews purchased from the West Indies company. Slave auctions were postponed if they fell on a Jewish holiday. In Curacao in the seventeenth century, as well as in the British colonies of Barbados and Jamaica in the eighteenth century, Jewish merchants played a major role in the slave trade. In fact, in all the American colonies, whether French (Martinique), British, or Dutch, Jewish merchants frequently dominated."
"This was no less true on the North American mainland, where during the eighteenth century Jews participated in the "triangular trade" that brought slaves form Africa to the West Indies and there exchanged them for molasses, which in turn was taken to New England and converted into rum for sale in Africa. Isaac Da Costa of Charleston in the 1750's, David Franks of Philadelphia in the 1760;s and Aaron Lopez (he his his Jewish identity like many of the Dutch and Spanish Jews) of Newport in the late 1760's and early 1770's dominated Jewish slave trading on the American continent."
Jews were also involved in white slave trades like the Crimean slave trade. Again a Jewish source.
https://www.jjs-online.net/archives/article/2730
"Slaves, Money Lenders, and Prisoner Guards: The Jews and the Trade in Slaves and Captives in the Crimean Khanate"
So how about modern Judaism. What are their thoughts on slavery today? I give you another Jewish source and the CHIEF RABBI OF ISRAEL. https://www.timesofisrael.com/chief-rabbi-compares-african-americans-to-monkeys/
Along with calling black people monkeys he has said "Non-Jews, Yosef said, are in Israel only to serve Jews."
Debunked on the stuff I gave you.
Moving goal posts, we were talking about North America, not brazil. Focus!
Everything lese, I can't be bothered...Just read this https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/jews-and-the-african-slave-trade/
Not debunked. Not even close to debunked.
Also the point about Brazil if you had the capacity to read and understand was that out of the 10,000,000-15,000,000 slaves brought over from Africa to the western hemisphere, only 400,000 came to North America, anywhere from 4% to as low as 2.6% of them ended up in the United States, where at minimum 96% of the slaves went to South America into places like Brazil.
In that regard for how "evil" people make out America to be with slavery, Anywhere south of the border is 25x worse that the most vile depiction of US slavery.
But no one cares about those slaves because they don't make enough money to be counted in the publics conscience. It's why not one single celebrity gives a shit that you can buy an african slave in the middle east for $90. Because championing those people doesn't get them millions of dollars in donations from suckers who think that those people will fight for them.
What are you talking about?
I never said anything of what you are talking about. I simply debunked the claims that the majority of the slave owners and traders were Jewish as per the claim of the stormfag.
Don't care. Learn to read.
Projections? Seems like it.
Learn to read.
Your post is technically correct. The Jewish role in the British-US slave trade was minimal, also their role in plantation ownership was minimal.
We should understand the reasons for this in the broader context of the Atlantic Slave trade.
The slave trade to the Americas was dominated by three large slave trading companies, The Royal African Company (British), Geoctrooieerde Westindische Compagnie (Dutch) and Compagnie Française des Indes occidentales (French).
Of these companies, the French and the British banned Jews from participating in the slave trade.
However, the Dutch company had 10% Jewish ownership and shipped nearly 40% of all slaves ever shipped to the Americas through the Atlantic slave trade. Roughly, 5.3M individuals (Patrick Manning, The Atlantic Slave Trade: Effects on Economies, Societies and Peoples in Africa, the Americas, and Europe, Duke University Press, 1992)
The Great majority of these slaves were shipped to Brazil, and the Caribbean, where retail traders and resellers were overwhelmingly Jews. (David Lowenthal, "West Indian Societies", Oxford Press, 1972).
Jews dominated the market providing African slaves to plantation owners, and had little to no interest in actually owning plantations themselves (Arnold Wiznitzer, "Jews in Colonial Brazil", Columbia University Press, 1960).
Thank you for your scholarly post.
Thank you for trying in moving the goal posts but you failed. Dont forget to read theblink I shared in than previous post. It saves my time in debunking your nonsense.
Ihttps://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/style/longterm/books/chap1/jewsslavesandtheslavetrade.htm
You can try to trivialize it all you want, but even if we ignore the retail/resale aspect, and just go for proportional 10% ownership in the Dutch company, that amounts to more than half a million people trafficked for enslavement.
But by all means, ignore this level of brutality and suffering to rationalize your point of view.
And who owned the other 90% of the company?
And you care? You only care because only a tiny minority of Jews owned some slaves somewhere in the world(And a discussion only started because a moron thought to blame Jews of owning slaves in America on a thread about woke washing in hollywood), otherwise, you would rejoice on it. And despite that tiny minority owning slaves, it still was a tiny minority and the whole doesn't deserve the blame you are placing.
"And you care? You only care because only a tiny minority of Jews owned some slaves somewhere in the world"
I care because I am of Sephardic ancestry and because I find the selling of another human being abhorrent, let alone half a million people.
Why do you so rabidly not care about the suffering of these people?
Why do you so ardently minimize responsibility of those who victimized them simply because they were jews?
It's a miracle. Not a stormfag peddling socialism.
Quote me
I am minimizing the role Jews played on it because their role was minimal.
Answer the question, who owned the other 90%?
Comment Reported for: Rule 16: Identity Attacks
Comment Removed