You can try to trivialize it all you want, but even if we ignore the retail/resale aspect, and just go for proportional 10% ownership in the Dutch company, that amounts to more than half a million people trafficked for enslavement.
But by all means, ignore this level of brutality and suffering to rationalize your point of view.
And you care? You only care because only a tiny minority of Jews owned some slaves somewhere in the world(And a discussion only started because a moron thought to blame Jews of owning slaves in America on a thread about woke washing in hollywood), otherwise, you would rejoice on it. And despite that tiny minority owning slaves, it still was a tiny minority and the whole doesn't deserve the blame you are placing.
"only a tiny minority of Jews owned some slaves somewhere in the world"
This is obviously pejorative and dismissive. Who cares?, only "some slaves".
There is no recognition that half a million people sold as slaves is a sizeable crime against humanity. Only callous dismissal.
And of course, the other 90% of the Dutch company was owned by non jews, which in no way validates your relativism.
The truth is that YES, jews trafficked and profited from selling a LARGE number of people as slaves, and NO 10% of the slave traffic is not something you can minimize and dismiss as "some slaves".
No matter how much moral relativism and name calling you use.
We can continue this discussion in Ladino, if you have any doubts about my background.
You can try to trivialize it all you want, but even if we ignore the retail/resale aspect, and just go for proportional 10% ownership in the Dutch company, that amounts to more than half a million people trafficked for enslavement.
But by all means, ignore this level of brutality and suffering to rationalize your point of view.
And who owned the other 90% of the company?
And you care? You only care because only a tiny minority of Jews owned some slaves somewhere in the world(And a discussion only started because a moron thought to blame Jews of owning slaves in America on a thread about woke washing in hollywood), otherwise, you would rejoice on it. And despite that tiny minority owning slaves, it still was a tiny minority and the whole doesn't deserve the blame you are placing.
"And you care? You only care because only a tiny minority of Jews owned some slaves somewhere in the world"
I care because I am of Sephardic ancestry and because I find the selling of another human being abhorrent, let alone half a million people.
Why do you so rabidly not care about the suffering of these people?
Why do you so ardently minimize responsibility of those who victimized them simply because they were jews?
It's a miracle. Not a stormfag peddling socialism.
Quote me
I am minimizing the role Jews played on it because their role was minimal.
Answer the question, who owned the other 90%?
This is obviously pejorative and dismissive. Who cares?, only "some slaves".
There is no recognition that half a million people sold as slaves is a sizeable crime against humanity. Only callous dismissal.
And of course, the other 90% of the Dutch company was owned by non jews, which in no way validates your relativism.
The truth is that YES, jews trafficked and profited from selling a LARGE number of people as slaves, and NO 10% of the slave traffic is not something you can minimize and dismiss as "some slaves".
No matter how much moral relativism and name calling you use.
We can continue this discussion in Ladino, if you have any doubts about my background.