"only a tiny minority of Jews owned some slaves somewhere in the world"
This is obviously pejorative and dismissive. Who cares?, only "some slaves".
There is no recognition that half a million people sold as slaves is a sizeable crime against humanity. Only callous dismissal.
And of course, the other 90% of the Dutch company was owned by non jews, which in no way validates your relativism.
The truth is that YES, jews trafficked and profited from selling a LARGE number of people as slaves, and NO 10% of the slave traffic is not something you can minimize and dismiss as "some slaves".
No matter how much moral relativism and name calling you use.
We can continue this discussion in Ladino, if you have any doubts about my background.
This is obviously pejorative and dismissive. Who cares?, only "some slaves"
Read the context. And then you will see that blaming the whole community for the actions of very few is stormfaggotry level of stupidity.
There is no recognition that half a million people sold as slaves is a sizeable crime against humanity. Only callous dismissal.
And who dismissed it?
And of course, the other 90% of the Dutch company was owned by non jews, which in no way validates your relativism.
So, all the Jews are to blame for the action of 10%(if we believe your source, which I don't), meanwhile, none of the whites are to blame for the 90% got it!
The truth is that YES, jews trafficked and profited from selling a LARGE number of people as slaves, and NO 10% of the slave traffic is not something you can minimize and dismiss as "some slaves".
In summary "all Jews are to blame", saying that does it make you feel better?
No matter how much moral relativism and name calling you use.
You are the one doing it. Who is blaming the whole demographic here? Me or you?
You can't quote me "blaming all Jews", because I never did such a thing.
On the other hand, you have a pathological problem recognizing that a horrible crime against humanity was committed against a LARGE number of individuals sold as slaves, and that YES, there were Jews profiteering and participating actively in this trade.
Again, 10% ownership in the Dutch company, half a million people trafficked like cattle, are not small numbers.
Stop minimizing other people's suffering to justify your narrative.
I have heard this before from other groups claiming that "only a few XXXXX were involved in the genocide of only NNNNNN individuals, stop telling the facts or you are blaming all XXXXXs!"
You can't quote me "blaming all Jews", because I never did such a thing.
Just as you can't quote me dismissing slavery. But somehow, you are trying, in all your posts so far, to blame the Jews for the actions of a few.
Again, 10% ownership in the Dutch company, half a million people trafficked like cattle, are not small numbers.
Again, who owned the 90%?
Stop minimizing other people's suffering to justify your narrative.
quote me
I have heard this before from other groups claiming that "only a few XXXXX were involved in the genocide of only NNNNNN individuals, stop telling the facts or you are blaming all XXXXXs!"
I also heard a certain group blaming all the followers of a religion, or a race for the actions of a few. I wonder who those are...
It's a miracle. Not a stormfag peddling socialism.
Quote me
I am minimizing the role Jews played on it because their role was minimal.
Answer the question, who owned the other 90%?
This is obviously pejorative and dismissive. Who cares?, only "some slaves".
There is no recognition that half a million people sold as slaves is a sizeable crime against humanity. Only callous dismissal.
And of course, the other 90% of the Dutch company was owned by non jews, which in no way validates your relativism.
The truth is that YES, jews trafficked and profited from selling a LARGE number of people as slaves, and NO 10% of the slave traffic is not something you can minimize and dismiss as "some slaves".
No matter how much moral relativism and name calling you use.
We can continue this discussion in Ladino, if you have any doubts about my background.
Read the context. And then you will see that blaming the whole community for the actions of very few is stormfaggotry level of stupidity.
And who dismissed it?
So, all the Jews are to blame for the action of 10%(if we believe your source, which I don't), meanwhile, none of the whites are to blame for the 90% got it!
In summary "all Jews are to blame", saying that does it make you feel better?
You are the one doing it. Who is blaming the whole demographic here? Me or you?
Cool. Call me when you stop blaming all Jews.
You can't quote me "blaming all Jews", because I never did such a thing.
On the other hand, you have a pathological problem recognizing that a horrible crime against humanity was committed against a LARGE number of individuals sold as slaves, and that YES, there were Jews profiteering and participating actively in this trade.
Again, 10% ownership in the Dutch company, half a million people trafficked like cattle, are not small numbers.
Stop minimizing other people's suffering to justify your narrative.
I have heard this before from other groups claiming that "only a few XXXXX were involved in the genocide of only NNNNNN individuals, stop telling the facts or you are blaming all XXXXXs!"
Just as you can't quote me dismissing slavery. But somehow, you are trying, in all your posts so far, to blame the Jews for the actions of a few.
Again, who owned the 90%?
quote me
I also heard a certain group blaming all the followers of a religion, or a race for the actions of a few. I wonder who those are...