You can't quote me "blaming all Jews", because I never did such a thing.
Just as you can't quote me dismissing slavery. But somehow, you are trying, in all your posts so far, to blame the Jews for the actions of a few.
Again, 10% ownership in the Dutch company, half a million people trafficked like cattle, are not small numbers.
Again, who owned the 90%?
Stop minimizing other people's suffering to justify your narrative.
quote me
I have heard this before from other groups claiming that "only a few XXXXX were involved in the genocide of only NNNNNN individuals, stop telling the facts or you are blaming all XXXXXs!"
I also heard a certain group blaming all the followers of a religion, or a race for the actions of a few. I wonder who those are...
And you care? You only care because only a tiny minority of Jews owned some slaves somewhere in the world(And a discussion only started because a moron thought to blame Jews of owning slaves in America on a thread about woke washing in hollywood), otherwise, you would rejoice on it. And despite that tiny minority owning slaves, it still was a tiny minority and the whole doesn't deserve the blame you are placing
The Dutch company trafficked 53M+ people into slavery. It was 10% Jewish owned.
I get it... 10% (as per your claim, I still want to verify it, but I can't find the book to read it) gets the balls as if they did 90%.
Come on just admit it. Say it, you hate Jews.
I can prove you moved goal posts, and until you provide a copy of the book with those claims or accept that you are putting the blame of 10% of the owners of the company on all Jews you can go and choke on my cock.
Obvious and weak provocation, but I don't hate Jews. Both sides of my family are Sephardic, migrated from Morocco and Turkey. Originally from a small town near Leon, Spain, that still bears our last name. I'd appreciate it if you'd stop insulting me this way.
until you provide a copy of the book with those claims...
The book is available at JSTOR, get your own copy. If you can't, the particular reference to ownership is also found in articles from the WAPOST. Search for them.
Some excerpts from the book for you:
Tax Farming (collecting royalties on sugar farmed by slaves):
"In the field of tax farming, however, the Jews were leaders... The weight of the evidence adduced points to the conclusion that 63 percent of the tax farming business in Dutch Brazil were in Jewish hands."
Direct purchase and resale of slaves:
"Besides their important position in the sugar industry and in tax farming, they dominated the slave trade. From 1636 to 1645 a total of 23,163 Negro slaves arrived from Africa and were sold for 6,714,423 florins. The West India Company, which monopolized imports of slaves from Africa, sold slaves at public auctions against cash payment. It happened that cash was mostly in the hands of Jews. The buyers who appeared at the auctions were almost always Jews, and because of this lack of competitors they could buy slaves at low prices. On the other hand, there also was no competition in the selling of the slaves to the plantation owners and other buyers, and most of them purchased on credit payable at the next harvest in sugar. Profits up to 300 percent of the purchase value were often realized with high interest rates. If it happened that the date of such an auction fell on a Jewish holiday, the auction had to be postponed."
Just as you can't quote me dismissing slavery. But somehow, you are trying, in all your posts so far, to blame the Jews for the actions of a few.
Again, who owned the 90%?
quote me
I also heard a certain group blaming all the followers of a religion, or a race for the actions of a few. I wonder who those are...
I did already, "some slaves", to refer to half a million people brutalized and sold as property is dismissive and minimizes their suffering.
Here's the facts again:
You can't prove me factually wrong.
I get it... 10% (as per your claim, I still want to verify it, but I can't find the book to read it) gets the balls as if they did 90%.
Come on just admit it. Say it, you hate Jews.
I can prove you moved goal posts, and until you provide a copy of the book with those claims or accept that you are putting the blame of 10% of the owners of the company on all Jews you can go and choke on my cock.
Obvious and weak provocation, but I don't hate Jews. Both sides of my family are Sephardic, migrated from Morocco and Turkey. Originally from a small town near Leon, Spain, that still bears our last name. I'd appreciate it if you'd stop insulting me this way.
The book is available at JSTOR, get your own copy. If you can't, the particular reference to ownership is also found in articles from the WAPOST. Search for them.
Some excerpts from the book for you:
Tax Farming (collecting royalties on sugar farmed by slaves):
Direct purchase and resale of slaves:
We are done here.
Look where I found your quote... And I couldn't find the quotes on that book anywhere. Weird.
And the only places they are found are from nation of Islam and David Duke esque websites. Including David Duke.
https://davidduke.com/if-the-white-race-is-to-be-condemned-in-the-liberal-press-why-are-not-the-jewish-people-condemned-the-worlds-leading-role-in-the-slave-trade-over-the-last-2000-years/
The first quote you gave are from another book too, that deals specifically on one tiny region in the north of Brazil. Stop lying and being dishonest.
Give me the link for the passage on the book. Because so far you smell of anti-semite trying to pass on as "hello fellow Jews" type.
I didn't dispute the fact that Jews owned slaves I dispute the fact they are to receive the full blame of the actions of the "90%" who were nonjews.
Cope and choke on my cock. I guess we are done here indeed.
Find better sources next time you want to peddle your hate. And I doubt your claims about your background.
Ps: those are not Sephardic Jews, but Mizrahi Jews. You stormfaggot.