Here's the WAPost article as well, citing a work from the same author:
"Under the auspices of the Dutch, Sephardic Jews also had a direct hand in wholesale slaving. As Arnold Wiznitzer has pointed out, Jews in Amsterdam owned as much as 10 percent of the stock in the Dutch West India Company, the great slave-shipping enterprise that helped launch the Netherlands to International commercial prominence during the 1600s"
Ps: those are not Sephardic Jews, but Mizrahi Jews. You stormfaggot
First, I have never claimed these were Sephardim. You lack the most basic reading comprehension skills.
Because so far you smell of anti-semite trying to pass on as "hello fellow Jews" type.
I don't consider myself a "Jew", but both sides of my family are Sephardic. I grew up outside the culture for reasons that are none of your business.
As I said before, I am fluent in Ladino, if you have any doubts about my background, and will be fine to continue the discussion in that language.
The only thing you have are vulgar insults and ad-hominem "anti-semitist" slurs.
Quote 3 - from WA Post article by David Mills, citing another work from the same author: https://ibb.co/7jfvqHf
You claimed to be sephardic. Meanwhile your ancestry is Mizrahi.
You are ignorant of the Spanish diaspora. Again, I will continue this discussion in Ladino, if you doubt my background. Also, not important to the facts I am stating.
you blame all the Jews
I have challenged you to quote me, but you can't, because you are lying.
Again, the facts:
The Dutch company trafficked 53M+ people into slavery. It was 10% Jewish owned.
That equates to earning 10% on the head of every person enslaved, all 53M+ of them, or full sale price on 530k+ people.
These are NOT small numbers. This is a crime against humanity.
Jews dominated the Dutch slave markets as resellers, dominated sugar tax farming, produced by slaves.
You can't prove me factually wrong.
You are stupid and cannot digest factual information when it contradicts your preconceptions.
You are an ignorant idiot and are quick to charge to defend your stupidity.
"In the field of tax farming, however, the Jews were leaders... The weight of the evidence adduced points to the conclusion that 63 percent of the tax farming business in Dutch Brazil were in Jewish hands."
Arnold Wiznitzer
"Besides their important position in the sugar industry and in tax farming, they dominated the slave trade. From 1636 to 1645 a total of 23,163 Negro slaves arrived from Africa and were sold for 6,714,423 florins. The West India Company, which monopolized imports of slaves from Africa, sold slaves at public auctions against cash payment. It happened that cash was mostly in the hands of Jews. The buyers who appeared at the auctions were almost always Jews, and because of this lack of competitors they could buy slaves at low prices. On the other hand, there also was no competition in the selling of the slaves to the plantation owners and other buyers, and most of them purchased on credit payable at the next harvest in sugar. Profits up to 300 percent of the purchase value were often realized with high interest rates. If it happened that the date of such an auction fell on a Jewish holiday, the auction had to be postponed."
You are ignorant of the Spanish diaspora. Again, I will continue this discussion in Ladino, if you doubt my background. Also, not important to the facts I am stating.
Do it. Not my fault if you lied.
I have challenged you to quote me, but you can't, because you are lying.
Here is the evidence that you are blaming Jews for the actions of the 90% of non-Jews:
The Dutch company trafficked 53M+ people into slavery. It was 10% Jewish owned.
That equates to earning 10% on the head of every person enslaved, all 53M+ of them, or full sale price on 530k+ people.
These are NOT small numbers. This is a crime against humanity.
Jews dominated the Dutch slave markets as resellers, dominated sugar tax farming, produced by slaves.
To debunk it, you will have to come out and say, specifically, that you blame whites for the actions of those 90%, and that Jews should not get the blame. Then you will have to admit and blame blacks and Arabs for selling and capturing those slaves to be sold to the westerners.
Anything less than that, you are blaming all Jews.
Look where I found your quote... And I couldn't find the quotes on that book anywhere. Weird.
And the only places they are found are from nation of Islam and David Duke esque websites. Including David Duke.
https://davidduke.com/if-the-white-race-is-to-be-condemned-in-the-liberal-press-why-are-not-the-jewish-people-condemned-the-worlds-leading-role-in-the-slave-trade-over-the-last-2000-years/
The first quote you gave are from another book too, that deals specifically on one tiny region in the north of Brazil. Stop lying and being dishonest.
Give me the link for the passage on the book. Because so far you smell of anti-semite trying to pass on as "hello fellow Jews" type.
I didn't dispute the fact that Jews owned slaves I dispute the fact they are to receive the full blame of the actions of the "90%" who were nonjews.
Cope and choke on my cock. I guess we are done here indeed.
Find better sources next time you want to peddle your hate. And I doubt your claims about your background.
Ps: those are not Sephardic Jews, but Mizrahi Jews. You stormfaggot.
You are stupid and ignorant, incapable of basic research, and prompt to charge based on your own stupidity.
The Book I quoted from is in JSTOR: https://www.jstor.org/stable/43059106
Jews in Colonial Brazil by Arnold Wiznitzer
The quotes came from pages 71 - 72.
Here's the WAPost article as well, citing a work from the same author:
First, I have never claimed these were Sephardim. You lack the most basic reading comprehension skills.
I don't consider myself a "Jew", but both sides of my family are Sephardic. I grew up outside the culture for reasons that are none of your business.
As I said before, I am fluent in Ladino, if you have any doubts about my background, and will be fine to continue the discussion in that language.
The only thing you have are vulgar insults and ad-hominem "anti-semitist" slurs.
Your first quote is from that guy. Sadly, your second quote is from David Duke, Nation of Islam et al. Pay attention. LEARN TO READ.
And you give me page 73...
[citation needed] as to where he got those claims.
You claimed to be sephardic. Meanwhile your ancestry is Mizrahi. This shows your do not know what you are talking about.
Pressing X to doubt here.
It would be ad-hominem if I was lying. I'm not.
Meanwhile, your claims, and moving goal posts, still has yet to be proven.
After all, you blame all the Jews for the crimes of the 90% who were non-Jews.
Fascinating, stormfag.
You are an idiot and a liar.
Quote 1& 2 - from Arnold Wiznitzer's Jews in Colonial Brazil": https://ibb.co/xCGnk9M
Quote 3 - from WA Post article by David Mills, citing another work from the same author: https://ibb.co/7jfvqHf
You are ignorant of the Spanish diaspora. Again, I will continue this discussion in Ladino, if you doubt my background. Also, not important to the facts I am stating.
I have challenged you to quote me, but you can't, because you are lying.
Again, the facts:
You can't prove me factually wrong.
You are stupid and cannot digest factual information when it contradicts your preconceptions.
You are an ignorant idiot and are quick to charge to defend your stupidity.
Arnold Wiznitzer
Source Johan Mauritz and source: https://davidduke.com/if-the-white-race-is-to-be-condemned-in-the-liberal-press-why-are-not-the-jewish-people-condemned-the-worlds-leading-role-in-the-slave-trade-over-the-last-2000-years/
Arnold Wiznitzer =/= Johan Mauritz =/= David Duke
You are all over the place
Do it. Not my fault if you lied.
Here is the evidence that you are blaming Jews for the actions of the 90% of non-Jews:
To debunk it, you will have to come out and say, specifically, that you blame whites for the actions of those 90%, and that Jews should not get the blame. Then you will have to admit and blame blacks and Arabs for selling and capturing those slaves to be sold to the westerners.
Anything less than that, you are blaming all Jews.
Until you do, read this: https://www.haaretz.com/opinion/.premium-labour-s-latest-blaming-jews-for-slave-trade-1.5390569
And the best of all, debunking some of your claims: https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/arts-letters/articles/slave-trade-black-muslim