Quote 3 - from WA Post article by David Mills, citing another work from the same author: https://ibb.co/7jfvqHf
You claimed to be sephardic. Meanwhile your ancestry is Mizrahi.
You are ignorant of the Spanish diaspora. Again, I will continue this discussion in Ladino, if you doubt my background. Also, not important to the facts I am stating.
you blame all the Jews
I have challenged you to quote me, but you can't, because you are lying.
Again, the facts:
The Dutch company trafficked 53M+ people into slavery. It was 10% Jewish owned.
That equates to earning 10% on the head of every person enslaved, all 53M+ of them, or full sale price on 530k+ people.
These are NOT small numbers. This is a crime against humanity.
Jews dominated the Dutch slave markets as resellers, dominated sugar tax farming, produced by slaves.
You can't prove me factually wrong.
You are stupid and cannot digest factual information when it contradicts your preconceptions.
You are an ignorant idiot and are quick to charge to defend your stupidity.
"In the field of tax farming, however, the Jews were leaders... The weight of the evidence adduced points to the conclusion that 63 percent of the tax farming business in Dutch Brazil were in Jewish hands."
Arnold Wiznitzer
"Besides their important position in the sugar industry and in tax farming, they dominated the slave trade. From 1636 to 1645 a total of 23,163 Negro slaves arrived from Africa and were sold for 6,714,423 florins. The West India Company, which monopolized imports of slaves from Africa, sold slaves at public auctions against cash payment. It happened that cash was mostly in the hands of Jews. The buyers who appeared at the auctions were almost always Jews, and because of this lack of competitors they could buy slaves at low prices. On the other hand, there also was no competition in the selling of the slaves to the plantation owners and other buyers, and most of them purchased on credit payable at the next harvest in sugar. Profits up to 300 percent of the purchase value were often realized with high interest rates. If it happened that the date of such an auction fell on a Jewish holiday, the auction had to be postponed."
You are ignorant of the Spanish diaspora. Again, I will continue this discussion in Ladino, if you doubt my background. Also, not important to the facts I am stating.
Do it. Not my fault if you lied.
I have challenged you to quote me, but you can't, because you are lying.
Here is the evidence that you are blaming Jews for the actions of the 90% of non-Jews:
The Dutch company trafficked 53M+ people into slavery. It was 10% Jewish owned.
That equates to earning 10% on the head of every person enslaved, all 53M+ of them, or full sale price on 530k+ people.
These are NOT small numbers. This is a crime against humanity.
Jews dominated the Dutch slave markets as resellers, dominated sugar tax farming, produced by slaves.
To debunk it, you will have to come out and say, specifically, that you blame whites for the actions of those 90%, and that Jews should not get the blame. Then you will have to admit and blame blacks and Arabs for selling and capturing those slaves to be sold to the westerners.
Anything less than that, you are blaming all Jews.
Your first quote is from that guy. Sadly, your second quote is from David Duke, Nation of Islam et al. Pay attention. LEARN TO READ.
And you give me page 73...
[citation needed] as to where he got those claims.
You claimed to be sephardic. Meanwhile your ancestry is Mizrahi. This shows your do not know what you are talking about.
Pressing X to doubt here.
It would be ad-hominem if I was lying. I'm not.
Meanwhile, your claims, and moving goal posts, still has yet to be proven.
After all, you blame all the Jews for the crimes of the 90% who were non-Jews.
Fascinating, stormfag.
You are an idiot and a liar.
Quote 1& 2 - from Arnold Wiznitzer's Jews in Colonial Brazil": https://ibb.co/xCGnk9M
Quote 3 - from WA Post article by David Mills, citing another work from the same author: https://ibb.co/7jfvqHf
You are ignorant of the Spanish diaspora. Again, I will continue this discussion in Ladino, if you doubt my background. Also, not important to the facts I am stating.
I have challenged you to quote me, but you can't, because you are lying.
Again, the facts:
You can't prove me factually wrong.
You are stupid and cannot digest factual information when it contradicts your preconceptions.
You are an ignorant idiot and are quick to charge to defend your stupidity.
Arnold Wiznitzer
Source Johan Mauritz and source: https://davidduke.com/if-the-white-race-is-to-be-condemned-in-the-liberal-press-why-are-not-the-jewish-people-condemned-the-worlds-leading-role-in-the-slave-trade-over-the-last-2000-years/
Arnold Wiznitzer =/= Johan Mauritz =/= David Duke
You are all over the place
Do it. Not my fault if you lied.
Here is the evidence that you are blaming Jews for the actions of the 90% of non-Jews:
To debunk it, you will have to come out and say, specifically, that you blame whites for the actions of those 90%, and that Jews should not get the blame. Then you will have to admit and blame blacks and Arabs for selling and capturing those slaves to be sold to the westerners.
Anything less than that, you are blaming all Jews.
Until you do, read this: https://www.haaretz.com/opinion/.premium-labour-s-latest-blaming-jews-for-slave-trade-1.5390569
And the best of all, debunking some of your claims: https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/arts-letters/articles/slave-trade-black-muslim